Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This technical monograph shifts the focus from raw model capability to system-level reliability for AI coding agents, emphasizing that deployment success depends on execution environments, state management, and verification protocols rather than just LLM performance. By synthesizing extensive scholarly and practitioner data, it establishes a framework where apparent model failures are often traced to infrastructure weaknesses like retrieval limits or resource allocation issues. The work provides actionable resources including gated practices, runnable evaluation protocols, and reusable agent skills for building robust software engineering systems that can safely recover from component failures.
Sources coveringarXiv, LessWrong, SiliconANGLE, AWS
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Engineering Reliable Coding Agents: Evaluating and Operating the System Around the Model

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2608.13867v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI coding agents are commonly evaluated as models but deployed as systems. Their reliability depends not only on model capability, but on the harness, execution state, retrieval, memory and state management, permissions, review interfaces, and resource allocation. This monograph examines those boundaries and develops a framework for evaluating and operating coding agents reliably. It synthesizes 164 scholarly works, 100 practitioner records, 29 benchmark records, and 17 author-system case records through a structured multivocal review, targeted update audits, software-engineering coverage analysis, and distributed-systems evidence synthesis. Across this evidence, many apparent model failures originate elsewhere in the system, while improvements at one layer often fail to propagate to end-to-end outcomes. Evaluation and operation are treated as a dependency chain in which weaknesses in task construction, execution environments, retrieval, state management, verification, or observability can invalidate downstream conclusions. The monograph contributes a versioned catalog of 206 reliability records: 193 gated practices, including 56 developed in depth, plus 13 research leads; an evidence ledger; a framework for dependency and repair asymmetry across the agent lifecycle; measurements and failure cases from operated agent systems; runnable evaluation and reliability protocols; and five reusable agent skills with evidence maps. Together, these provide a system-level methodology for distinguishing model capability from infrastructure effects, designing defensible evaluations, and building systems that recover safely when components fail. The review is structured rather than exhaustive, evidence strength varies by topic, and results depend on workload and configuration. The methods record which search lanes were executed, which remain unexecuted, and limits on evidence-grading claims.

Abstract:AI coding agents are commonly evaluated as models but deployed as systems. Their reliability depends not only on model capability, but on the harness, execution state, retrieval, memory and state management, permissions, review interfaces, and resource allocation. This monograph examines those boundaries and develops a framework for evaluating and operating coding agents reliably. It synthesizes 164 scholarly works, 100 practitioner records, 29 benchmark records, and 17 author-system case records through a structured multivocal review, targeted update audits, software-engineering coverage analysis, and distributed-systems evidence synthesis. Across this evidence, many apparent model failures originate elsewhere in the system, while improvements at one layer often fail to propagate to end-to-end outcomes. Evaluation and operation are treated as a dependency chain in which weaknesses in task construction, execution environments, retrieval, state management, verification, or observability can invalidate downstream conclusions. The monograph contributes a versioned catalog of 206 reliability records: 193 gated practices, including 56 developed in depth, plus 13 research leads; an evidence ledger; a framework for dependency and repair asymmetry across the agent lifecycle; measurements and failure cases from operated agent systems; runnable evaluation and reliability protocols; and five reusable agent skills with evidence maps. Together, these provide a system-level methodology for distinguishing model capability from infrastructure effects, designing defensible evaluations, and building systems that recover safely when components fail. The review is structured rather than exhaustive, evidence strength varies by topic, and results depend on workload and configuration. The methods record which search lanes were executed, which remain unexecuted, and limits on evidence-grading claims.

Technical review and engineering monograph, 314 pages, 30 figures. Includes an evidence audit, a companion research artifact with 206 reliability records, and runnable protocols for evaluating and operating AI coding agents. August 2026. Source, companion, and reusable protocols: this https URL

Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2608.13867 [cs.SE]

(or arXiv:2608.13867v1 [cs.SE] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.13867 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 390 words

Related coverage