aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces EVLA, a new benchmark that adapts robotics-focused Vision-Language-Action models to optimize residential battery scheduling via trajectory prediction. The study reveals a critical asymmetry where natural language objectives significantly drive prediction accuracy, whereas the RGB visual modality offers no aggregate advantage in this specific energy management context. By framing load balancing as a multimodal control problem, the work establishes a controlled environment for investigating how semantic intent influences automated decision-making in smart grids.
Energy Vision--Language--Action: A Controlled Multimodal Benchmark for Intent-Conditioned Residential Energy Management
arXiv:2609.31648v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are studied mainly in robotics, where visual observations and language instructions are mapped to physical actions. This paper introduces Energy Vision-Language-Action (EVLA), a controlled multimodal benchmark for intent-conditioned residential energy management. EVLA frames battery scheduling as a multimodal trajectory-prediction problem in which an RGB energy-field representation, a numerical operating state, and a natural-language objective are mapped to a 16-step battery-action trajectory generated by a finite-horizon sampling-based reference generator. Source windows are derived from public residential electrical-load data, while electricity price, battery state of charge, indoor temperature, and time of day are generated benchmark metadata. A hidden operating regime is encoded only through energy-field texture, enabling paired visual changes while the explicit numerical state is fixed. Crossing 439,203 retained base windows with three hidden regimes and five language objectives yields 6,588,045 multimodal instances. An initial study evaluates 36 configurations over three training seeds using fixed subsets of 5,000 training, 500 validation, and 500 test instances. In the MobileNet-family comparison, removing processed language increases trajectory mean-squared error from 0.3856 +/- 0.0039 to 0.8628 +/- 0.0001, whereas removing vision yields 0.3843 +/- 0.0013, comparable to the full model. The results show strong asymmetry in modality use: the processed-language pathway is strongly associated with prediction quality, while the current RGB pathway provides no aggregate error advantage. These results characterize the fixed pilot subset and executed protocol rather than full-benchmark training. EVLA provides a controlled setting for studying how semantic intent and latent context influence residential energy-action prediction.
Abstract:Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are studied mainly in robotics, where visual observations and language instructions are mapped to physical actions. This paper introduces Energy Vision-Language-Action (EVLA), a controlled multimodal benchmark for intent-conditioned residential energy management. EVLA frames battery scheduling as a multimodal trajectory-prediction problem in which an RGB energy-field representation, a numerical operating state, and a natural-language objective are mapped to a 16-step battery-action trajectory generated by a finite-horizon sampling-based reference generator. Source windows are derived from public residential electrical-load data, while electricity price, battery state of charge, indoor temperature, and time of day are generated benchmark metadata. A hidden operating regime is encoded only through energy-field texture, enabling paired visual changes while the explicit numerical state is fixed. Crossing 439,203 retained base windows with three hidden regimes and five language objectives yields 6,588,045 multimodal instances. An initial study evaluates 36 configurations over three training seeds using fixed subsets of 5,000 training, 500 validation, and 500 test instances. In the MobileNet-family comparison, removing processed language increases trajectory mean-squared error from 0.3856 +/- 0.0039 to 0.8628 +/- 0.0001, whereas removing vision yields 0.3843 +/- 0.0013, comparable to the full model. The results show strong asymmetry in modality use: the processed-language pathway is strongly associated with prediction quality, while the current RGB pathway provides no aggregate error advantage. These results characterize the fixed pilot subset and executed protocol rather than full-benchmark training. EVLA provides a controlled setting for studying how semantic intent and latent context influence residential energy-action prediction.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2609.31648 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.31648v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31648 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 345 words
