Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Energy-Aware Performance Evaluation of Nonlinear Mechatronic Systems Under Matched-Tracking Conditions
arXiv:2608.23578v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Trajectory-tracking metrics such as root-mean-square error (RMSE), overshoot, and settling time are widely used to evaluate control performance in mechatronic systems. However, these measures describe output tracking alone and do not account for the actuator effort required to produce the observed motion. This limitation becomes more pronounced in nonlinear systems, where stiffness and dissipation depend on the system state. This paper examines how these effects influence actuator energy under similar tracking conditions. An energy-aware evaluation framework is introduced that combines tracking error with cumulative actuator energy and enables comparison between systems with approximately matched performance. A simple index (EAPI) is used to capture both aspects in a single measure. Simulation results for linear and nonlinear systems under proportional-derivative control show that comparable tracking accuracy can correspond to significantly different actuator energy. The nonlinear system consistently requires more energy across matched operating points, reflecting the influence of nonlinear stiffness and friction. These results suggest that trajectory-based metrics alone may not fully capture differences in system effort, and that including energy provides a more informative basis for performance evaluation.
Abstract:Trajectory-tracking metrics such as root-mean-square error (RMSE), overshoot, and settling time are widely used to evaluate control performance in mechatronic systems. However, these measures describe output tracking alone and do not account for the actuator effort required to produce the observed motion. This limitation becomes more pronounced in nonlinear systems, where stiffness and dissipation depend on the system state. This paper examines how these effects influence actuator energy under similar tracking conditions. An energy-aware evaluation framework is introduced that combines tracking error with cumulative actuator energy and enables comparison between systems with approximately matched performance. A simple index (EAPI) is used to capture both aspects in a single measure. Simulation results for linear and nonlinear systems under proportional-derivative control show that comparable tracking accuracy can correspond to significantly different actuator energy. The nonlinear system consistently requires more energy across matched operating points, reflecting the influence of nonlinear stiffness and friction. These results suggest that trajectory-based metrics alone may not fully capture differences in system effort, and that including energy provides a more informative basis for performance evaluation.
Accepted at MERCon 2026. To be presented at MERCon 2026. 6 pages, 5 figures
Systems and Control (eess.SY); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2608.23578 [eess.SY]
(or arXiv:2608.23578v1 [eess.SY] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.23578 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 286 words
Related coverage
Sustained Performance and Energy Accounting for Nonlinear Forecasting Across Classical and Simulated Quantum Models
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026
Characterizing High Bandwidth Flash for LLM Serving
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026

WISER and E.ON Advance Energy Demand Forecasting with Quantum Machine Learning
The Quantum Insider · Jul 24, 2026