aiqbench analysis
The paper tests whether a single end-to-end model built on Whisper can replace the usual ASR, disfluency-detection, and grammar-correction pipeline for spoken language learning. Its main levers are pseudo-labeling to scale training data from 77 to over 2,500 hours and an edit-confidence filter to reduce false feedback. For readers, the useful takeaway is the practical problem of label scarcity in speech tasks, and evidence that pseudo-labeling and confidence filtering can narrow the gap with cascaded systems. The results rest on two corpora, one of them in-house, so generalization is still an open question.
End-to-End Spoken Grammatical Error Correction
arXiv:2506.18532v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) and feedback play a vital role in supporting second language (L2) learners, educators, and examiners. While written GEC is well-established, spoken GEC (SGEC), aiming to provide feedback based on learners' speech, poses additional challenges due to disfluencies, transcription errors, and the lack of structured input. SGEC systems typically follow a cascaded pipeline consisting of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), disfluency detection, and GEC, making them vulnerable to error propagation across modules. This work examines an End-to-End (E2E) framework for SGEC and feedback generation, highlighting challenges and possible solutions when developing these systems. Cascaded, partial-cascaded and E2E architectures are compared, all built on the Whisper foundation model. A challenge for E2E systems is the scarcity of GEC labeled spoken data. To address this, an automatic pseudo-labeling framework is examined, increasing the training data from 77 to over 2500 hours. To improve the accuracy of the SGEC system, additional contextual information, exploiting the ASR output, is investigated. Candidate feedback of their mistakes is an essential step to improving performance. In E2E systems the SGEC output must be compared with an estimate of the fluent transcription to obtain the feedback. To improve the precision of this feedback, a novel reference alignment process is proposed that aims to remove hypothesised edits that results from fluent transcription errors. Finally, these approaches are combined with an edit confidence estimation approach, to exclude low-confidence edits. Experiments on the in-house Linguaskill (LNG) corpora and the publicly available Speak & Improve (S&I) corpus show that the proposed approaches significantly boost E2E SGEC performance.
Abstract:Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) and feedback play a vital role in supporting second language (L2) learners, educators, and examiners. While written GEC is well-established, spoken GEC (SGEC), aiming to provide feedback based on learners' speech, poses additional challenges due to disfluencies, transcription errors, and the lack of structured input. SGEC systems typically follow a cascaded pipeline consisting of Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), disfluency detection, and GEC, making them vulnerable to error propagation across modules. This work examines an End-to-End (E2E) framework for SGEC and feedback generation, highlighting challenges and possible solutions when developing these systems. Cascaded, partial-cascaded and E2E architectures are compared, all built on the Whisper foundation model. A challenge for E2E systems is the scarcity of GEC labeled spoken data. To address this, an automatic pseudo-labeling framework is examined, increasing the training data from 77 to over 2500 hours. To improve the accuracy of the SGEC system, additional contextual information, exploiting the ASR output, is investigated. Candidate feedback of their mistakes is an essential step to improving performance. In E2E systems the SGEC output must be compared with an estimate of the fluent transcription to obtain the feedback. To improve the precision of this feedback, a novel reference alignment process is proposed that aims to remove hypothesised edits that results from fluent transcription errors. Finally, these approaches are combined with an edit confidence estimation approach, to exclude low-confidence edits. Experiments on the in-house Linguaskill (LNG) corpora and the publicly available Speak & Improve (S&I) corpus show that the proposed approaches significantly boost E2E SGEC performance.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Sound (cs.SD); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
arXiv:2506.18532 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2506.18532v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.18532 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 360 words
Related coverage

Falcon-Emirati: When an LLM Learns the Dialect, the Culture, and the Nuance
Hugging Face · Oct 6, 2026
Encode Errors: Representational Retrieval of In-Context Demonstrations for Multilingual Grammatical Error Correction
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026

Six Principles of Voice Design: Designing for the Ear and Encoding It into Agent Script
Salesforce Blog · Oct 8, 2026
ArabiGEE: A Hierarchical Taxonomy for Arabic Grammatical Error Explanation
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026