aiqbench analysis
This research establishes that estimating quantized Berry phases remains BQP-complete for systems with inverse-polynomial spectral gaps, confirming a super-polynomial quantum advantage even at constant precision. By mapping general quantum computations to these topological invariants and identifying the spectral gap as the critical resource for classical tractability, the study clarifies the boundaries of quantum supremacy in physically motivated Hamiltonians like Heisenberg and XY models. These findings provide a rigorous foundation for leveraging geometric phases to demonstrate practical quantum advantage in condensed matter physics.
Encoding universal quantum computation into quantized Berry phases: Hardness results and classical algorithms
arXiv:2609.37199v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Berry phase is a fundamental geometric quantity for characterizing the geometry and topology of quantum many-body systems. Previous work established a super-polynomial quantum advantage in Berry phase estimation at inverse-polynomial precision, given an ansatz state approximating the initial ground state. However, whether this hardness persists for Berry phases quantized by symmetry, which can be distinguished at constant precision, remained open. In this work, we characterize the computational complexity of quantized Berry phase estimation. First, we prove that deciding whether the Berry phase is exactly $0$ or $\pi$ is $\mathsf{BQP}$-complete when the spectral gap is inverse-polynomially small. This result implies that distinguishing the quantized Berry phase still has a super-polynomial quantum advantage, assuming $\mathsf{BPP}\neq \mathsf{BQP}$. To prove this result, we introduce an encoding that maps the output of any quantum computation to a Berry phase that is exactly $0$ or $\pi$. Second, we extend this hardness to physically motivated Hamiltonians on a 2D square lattice, including Heisenberg and XY interactions. Third, we provide a classical polynomial-time algorithm for geometrically local Hamiltonians on fixed-dimensional lattices with constant spectral gaps. Therefore we identify that the spectral gap is a key resource for the classical tractability, rather than precision. These results establish a super-polynomial quantum advantage for computing a quantized topological invariant that is unchanged under symmetry- and gap-preserving deformations, and provide new steps towards practical quantum advantage in quantum physics.
Abstract:The Berry phase is a fundamental geometric quantity for characterizing the geometry and topology of quantum many-body systems. Previous work established a super-polynomial quantum advantage in Berry phase estimation at inverse-polynomial precision, given an ansatz state approximating the initial ground state. However, whether this hardness persists for Berry phases quantized by symmetry, which can be distinguished at constant precision, remained open. In this work, we characterize the computational complexity of quantized Berry phase estimation. First, we prove that deciding whether the Berry phase is exactly $0$ or $\pi$ is $\mathsf{BQP}$-complete when the spectral gap is inverse-polynomially small. This result implies that distinguishing the quantized Berry phase still has a super-polynomial quantum advantage, assuming $\mathsf{BPP}\neq \mathsf{BQP}$. To prove this result, we introduce an encoding that maps the output of any quantum computation to a Berry phase that is exactly $0$ or $\pi$. Second, we extend this hardness to physically motivated Hamiltonians on a 2D square lattice, including Heisenberg and XY interactions. Third, we provide a classical polynomial-time algorithm for geometrically local Hamiltonians on fixed-dimensional lattices with constant spectral gaps. Therefore we identify that the spectral gap is a key resource for the classical tractability, rather than precision. These results establish a super-polynomial quantum advantage for computing a quantized topological invariant that is unchanged under symmetry- and gap-preserving deformations, and provide new steps towards practical quantum advantage in quantum physics.
arXiv:2609.37199 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.37199v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.37199 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 319 words
Related coverage

Researchers Prove Berry Phase Estimation Remains Hard Computationally
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 2, 2026

Quantum Simulation of Nuclear Dynamics in First Quantization
Quantum Journal · Sep 2, 2026
Quantum phase estimation with optimal confidence interval using three control qubits
Quantum Journal · Aug 19, 2026

Three-Point Quantum Identity Confirms Existing Performance Limits for GKP Error-Correcting Codes
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026