Empirical Characterization of Learning Geometry in Hybrid Quantum Forecasting Models

arXiv:2608.19497v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We characterize the learning dynamics of a compact hybrid quantum forecasting model through comparison with a structurally aligned classical baseline. Using stationary harmonic-mixture and nonstationary chirp benchmarks with controlled spectral complexity and data availability, we analyze empirical Neural Tangent Kernel dynamics through kernel-target alignment, kernel drift, spectral concentration, and training loss. The classical model exhibits stronger early target alignment, whereas the hybrid model generally develops a less concentrated kernel spectrum and smaller kernel drift. Despite these distinct optimization geometries, both architectures attain similar held-out performance across the evaluated regimes. Notably, the hybrid model uses 125 trainable parameters compared with 281 for the classical baseline and reaches its validation-selected checkpoint earlier in 15 of 18 frequency conditions. A Fourier-augmented classical baseline does not reproduce the observed training behavior, while a controlled re-uploading ablation shows that repeated encoding systematically modifies both optimization and kernel geometry. These results demonstrate that comparable generalization can emerge from substantially different learning trajectories and that individual NTK diagnostics do not provide monotonic predictors of validation convergence. Rather than claiming a general quantum advantage, the study identifies architecture-dependent learning behavior that is masked by endpoint accuracy alone.

Abstract:We characterize the learning dynamics of a compact hybrid quantum forecasting model through comparison with a structurally aligned classical baseline. Using stationary harmonic-mixture and nonstationary chirp benchmarks with controlled spectral complexity and data availability, we analyze empirical Neural Tangent Kernel dynamics through kernel-target alignment, kernel drift, spectral concentration, and training loss. The classical model exhibits stronger early target alignment, whereas the hybrid model generally develops a less concentrated kernel spectrum and smaller kernel drift. Despite these distinct optimization geometries, both architectures attain similar held-out performance across the evaluated regimes. Notably, the hybrid model uses 125 trainable parameters compared with 281 for the classical baseline and reaches its validation-selected checkpoint earlier in 15 of 18 frequency conditions. A Fourier-augmented classical baseline does not reproduce the observed training behavior, while a controlled re-uploading ablation shows that repeated encoding systematically modifies both optimization and kernel geometry. These results demonstrate that comparable generalization can emerge from substantially different learning trajectories and that individual NTK diagnostics do not provide monotonic predictors of validation convergence. Rather than claiming a general quantum advantage, the study identifies architecture-dependent learning behavior that is masked by endpoint accuracy alone.

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2608.19497 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.19497v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.19497 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

Empirical Characterization of Learning Geometry in Hybrid Quantum Forecasting Models

Related coverage