aiqbench analysis
This research proposes a computational framework where high-level goals autonomously generate state-dependent emotional preferences to regulate priorities among competing lower-level objectives in reinforcement learning agents. By operationalizing these emotions as emergent mechanisms for dynamic goal trade-offs, the study demonstrates that such systems can adaptively handle changing environments without relying on externally fixed preference structures. The findings advance multi-objective optimization by showing how learned preference functions enable contextual priority switching and improved performance over static strategies.
Emotional Preferences as Goal-Priority Regulation
arXiv:2608.27072v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: A core question in decision-making for agents is whether the relative priorities of competing lower-level objectives can be determined by emotional preferences autonomously generated by higher-level goals, rather than being externally prespecified. Under changing external environments and evolving internal states, emotions play an important functional role in regulating the relative priorities of competing goals. Inspired by the goal-directed theory of emotion, this paper studies how such preference regulation can be computationally realized through reinforcement learning. We first propose a conception of emergent emotional preference: a high-level goal autonomously induces state-dependent preferences over competing lower-level objectives. This conception is built upon a framework consisting of a multi-objective reinforcement learning inner controller and an outer preference generator. The inner controller provides a repertoire of preference-conditioned goal-directed behaviors, while the outer preference generator learns a mapping from the current state to objective preferences through reinforcement learning on a high-level goal. We operationalize emotional preference as a state-dependent regulation of relative goal priorities that emerges through optimization. Furthermore, we characterize the policy space induced by preference regulation and derive an upper bound on the optimality gap in terms of the representation error of the inner behavioral repertoire. We show that the gap vanishes when the optimal policy can be represented by the available preference-conditioned policies. Experiments in self-constructed multi-objective exploration environments show that the learned preference function exhibits contextual priority switching, graded trade-offs, and temporal persistence, and outperforms the evaluated fixed-preference and handcrafted-preference strategies.
Abstract:A core question in decision-making for agents is whether the relative priorities of competing lower-level objectives can be determined by emotional preferences autonomously generated by higher-level goals, rather than being externally prespecified. Under changing external environments and evolving internal states, emotions play an important functional role in regulating the relative priorities of competing goals. Inspired by the goal-directed theory of emotion, this paper studies how such preference regulation can be computationally realized through reinforcement learning. We first propose a conception of emergent emotional preference: a high-level goal autonomously induces state-dependent preferences over competing lower-level objectives. This conception is built upon a framework consisting of a multi-objective reinforcement learning inner controller and an outer preference generator. The inner controller provides a repertoire of preference-conditioned goal-directed behaviors, while the outer preference generator learns a mapping from the current state to objective preferences through reinforcement learning on a high-level goal. We operationalize emotional preference as a state-dependent regulation of relative goal priorities that emerges through optimization. Furthermore, we characterize the policy space induced by preference regulation and derive an upper bound on the optimality gap in terms of the representation error of the inner behavioral repertoire. We show that the gap vanishes when the optimal policy can be represented by the available preference-conditioned policies. Experiments in self-constructed multi-objective exploration environments show that the learned preference function exhibits contextual priority switching, graded trade-offs, and temporal persistence, and outperforms the evaluated fixed-preference and handcrafted-preference strategies.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.27072 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2608.27072v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.27072 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 337 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026

Projection sampling preserves capabilities but diminishes gains from alignment fine-tuning
LessWrong · Oct 16, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026