aiqbench analysis
This study investigates whether Large Language Models injected with specific psychological personas replicate human patterns in managing emotional labor across social scenarios. The research demonstrates that models consistently favor "deep acting" strategies, with Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability traits reliably predicting these outputs regardless of the underlying model architecture. These findings offer critical insights into how personality-driven alignment influences behavioral consistency in AI agents beyond traditional occupational settings.
Emotional Labor Strategy Preferences in LLM Personas
arXiv:2609.00310v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Emotional labor is the effortful management of emotional displays to meet social or professional expectations. Personality traits have been correlated with emotional labor strategies, yet research on this link relies almost exclusively on self-report scales administered only in occupational settings. We investigate whether large language models injected with psychometrically grounded personas reproduce these personality-driven selection patterns across everyday social scenarios. We construct the first emotional labor strategy dataset of 500 socially situated events, each offering three behavioral choices corresponding to surface acting, deep acting, and genuine expression. We source 50 fictional characters from a large-scale personality repository and profile each through two parallel tracks: observer-rated bipolar adjective composites and in-character self-report items. Five LLMs evaluate all scenarios under both persona conditions. We find that models align more towards deep acting, and that Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability consistently predict this preference. Entropy analysis confirms that persona reliably influences the output and varies across models and emotions.
Abstract:Emotional labor is the effortful management of emotional displays to meet social or professional expectations. Personality traits have been correlated with emotional labor strategies, yet research on this link relies almost exclusively on self-report scales administered only in occupational settings. We investigate whether large language models injected with psychometrically grounded personas reproduce these personality-driven selection patterns across everyday social scenarios. We construct the first emotional labor strategy dataset of 500 socially situated events, each offering three behavioral choices corresponding to surface acting, deep acting, and genuine expression. We source 50 fictional characters from a large-scale personality repository and profile each through two parallel tracks: observer-rated bipolar adjective composites and in-character self-report items. Five LLMs evaluate all scenarios under both persona conditions. We find that models align more towards deep acting, and that Conscientiousness and Emotional Stability consistently predict this preference. Entropy analysis confirms that persona reliably influences the output and varies across models and emotions.
18 pages, 4 figures, 12 tables. Findings of the 2026 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2026)
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.00310 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2609.00310v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.00310 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words
Related coverage

Why do models task game?
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 6, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
From wantons to moral agents
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 12, 2026
Fable and Mythos: Model Welfare
LessWrong · Jun 16, 2026