aiqbench analysis
This research addresses a critical nuance in LLM safety alignment by demonstrating how emotional expressions can trigger unnecessary over-refusals on benign queries. The authors propose EmoRSS, an activation-steering technique that corrects these false negatives without retraining the model backbone, thereby improving the trade-off between safety and utility. This work advances our understanding of how affective cues interact with internal model states to influence decision-making boundaries.
EmoRSS: Mitigating Emotion-Induced Over-Refusal in Large Language Models
arXiv:2610.04998v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Emotional expression can influence the safety decisions of large language models (LLMs), offering a potential avenue for improving safety alignment. Existing studies have mainly focused on how emotional expressions facilitate attacks under harmful requests, while overlooking their effects on benign requests. We find that emotional expression can also systematically increase refusal tendencies on benign requests, leading to unnecessary over-refusal. Based on this observation, we propose emotion-guided refusal subspace steering (EmoRSS), an activation-steering method that mitigates emotion-induced over-refusal while preserving refusal behaviour on harmful requests. Specifically, we first identify a refusal-sensitive layer using layer-wise linear probes and construct a refusal subspace from sparse autoencoder (SAE) features aligned with the probe direction. Next, we use paired regular and emotional requests with the same queries to estimate the mean activation shift in the features defining the refusal subspace. Finally, we decode this shift into an activation intervention vector and apply it in the reverse refusal direction during inference, without updating the backbone parameters. Experiments on two LLMs show that, when requests contain emotional expressions, our method achieves a more favourable trade-off between refusing harmful requests and answering benign ones than prior over-refusal mitigation baselines, while better preserving general task performance.
Abstract:Emotional expression can influence the safety decisions of large language models (LLMs), offering a potential avenue for improving safety alignment. Existing studies have mainly focused on how emotional expressions facilitate attacks under harmful requests, while overlooking their effects on benign requests. We find that emotional expression can also systematically increase refusal tendencies on benign requests, leading to unnecessary over-refusal. Based on this observation, we propose emotion-guided refusal subspace steering (EmoRSS), an activation-steering method that mitigates emotion-induced over-refusal while preserving refusal behaviour on harmful requests. Specifically, we first identify a refusal-sensitive layer using layer-wise linear probes and construct a refusal subspace from sparse autoencoder (SAE) features aligned with the probe direction. Next, we use paired regular and emotional requests with the same queries to estimate the mean activation shift in the features defining the refusal subspace. Finally, we decode this shift into an activation intervention vector and apply it in the reverse refusal direction during inference, without updating the backbone parameters. Experiments on two LLMs show that, when requests contain emotional expressions, our method achieves a more favourable trade-off between refusing harmful requests and answering benign ones than prior over-refusal mitigation baselines, while better preserving general task performance.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.04998 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2610.04998v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04998 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words
Related coverage

The basic argument for making AI better at moral philosophy
LessWrong · Oct 14, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
Biological Superintelligence
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026
Open Distillation of Hereditary Traits
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 14, 2026