aiqbench analysis
EmoLASP demonstrates how integrating Answer Set Programming with large language models can enhance emotion recognition stability and reduce the computational costs associated with fine-tuning or processing long dialogue histories. This approach offers a promising pathway for making affective computing applications more efficient without relying on extensive model retraining.
EmoLASP: Emotion Recognition with Language Models and Answer Set Programming
arXiv:2608.29035v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Emotion recognition in conversations is increasingly tackled with language models, but these models can be unstable and expensive to fine-tune or to prompt with long dialogue histories. We propose EmoLASP, a framework that combines a language model with declarative reasoning via Answer Set Programming (ASP) to predict VAD scores (Valence-Arousal-Dominance) in conversations. Experiments on a widely used benchmark dataset (IEMOCAP) across six open-source LLMs (3B-120B) and two PLMs (BERT, RoBERTa) show that EmoLASP improves prediction performance compared to using the language model alone, even when the LLMs/PLMs are given no dialogue history in their prompts or input vectors. The gains are largest for prompt-only LLMs, which EmoLASP uses without any fine-tuning. However, for fine-tuned PLMs, the reasoner adds little once dialogue history is available. EmoLASP's LLM pipeline demonstrates the potential advantages of using a reasoning approach to ensure emotion prediction consistency and to reduce both the cost of fine-tuning and the cost of prompting with long dialogue histories.
Abstract:Emotion recognition in conversations is increasingly tackled with language models, but these models can be unstable and expensive to fine-tune or to prompt with long dialogue histories. We propose EmoLASP, a framework that combines a language model with declarative reasoning via Answer Set Programming (ASP) to predict VAD scores (Valence-Arousal-Dominance) in conversations. Experiments on a widely used benchmark dataset (IEMOCAP) across six open-source LLMs (3B-120B) and two PLMs (BERT, RoBERTa) show that EmoLASP improves prediction performance compared to using the language model alone, even when the LLMs/PLMs are given no dialogue history in their prompts or input vectors. The gains are largest for prompt-only LLMs, which EmoLASP uses without any fine-tuning. However, for fine-tuned PLMs, the reasoner adds little once dialogue history is available. EmoLASP's LLM pipeline demonstrates the potential advantages of using a reasoning approach to ensure emotion prediction consistency and to reduce both the cost of fine-tuning and the cost of prompting with long dialogue histories.
13 pages. Accepted to EMNLP 2026 Main Conference
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2608.29035 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2608.29035v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.29035 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words
Related coverage
Some Intuitions on Steering Vectors
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026
From wantons to moral agents
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 12, 2026

Underwriting Superintelligence: Backing Agents you can Sue — Rune Kvist, AIUC
Latent Space · Sep 16, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026