aiqbench analysis
This study provides a rigorous kinematic analysis of emergency braking and turning maneuvers in differential-drive robots, quantifying how approach speed impacts odometric error and avoidance success rates. By distinguishing between encoder discrepancies and actual recovery motion, the research offers critical empirical data for improving safety algorithms in autonomous mobile systems where reaction distance is limited. The findings are essential for engineers developing robust navigation stacks that must operate reliably under high-speed constraints.
Emergency Obstacle Avoidance Maneuvers in Differential-Drive Mobile Robots
arXiv:2610.05607v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Emergency obstacle avoidance requires a mobile robot to brake or change its heading within the available distance. This paper investigates the dependence of maneuver performance and odometric error on approach speed for a differential-drive robot. A footprint-clearance analysis and a normalized wheel-motion index provide a kinematic description of five braking and turning maneuvers. The principal experiment comprises 540 block-randomized trials on tile, of which 539 are retained, at commanded approach speeds of 45, 55, and 65 cm/s. An overhead camera provides an independent pose reference. When encoder, gyro, and camera heading changes are evaluated over complete motion records, the mean encoder discrepancy increases by 4.7-5.1 degrees for the two reverse-spin maneuvers between the lowest and highest speeds; the arc and brake-assisted pivot change by less than 0.4 degrees. Larger encoder discrepancy is associated with lower avoidance success after adjustment for distance, speed, maneuver, day, and turn direction. Gyro discrepancies remain approximately 3 degrees for the reverse spins. Estimated reaction distances for 90% success and their uncertainty quantify the maneuver trade-offs. The results support speed-specific empirical characterization of emergency maneuvers and distinguish encoder error from recovery motion and measurement-window mismatch.
Abstract:Emergency obstacle avoidance requires a mobile robot to brake or change its heading within the available distance. This paper investigates the dependence of maneuver performance and odometric error on approach speed for a differential-drive robot. A footprint-clearance analysis and a normalized wheel-motion index provide a kinematic description of five braking and turning maneuvers. The principal experiment comprises 540 block-randomized trials on tile, of which 539 are retained, at commanded approach speeds of 45, 55, and 65 cm/s. An overhead camera provides an independent pose reference. When encoder, gyro, and camera heading changes are evaluated over complete motion records, the mean encoder discrepancy increases by 4.7-5.1 degrees for the two reverse-spin maneuvers between the lowest and highest speeds; the arc and brake-assisted pivot change by less than 0.4 degrees. Larger encoder discrepancy is associated with lower avoidance success after adjustment for distance, speed, maneuver, day, and turn direction. Gyro discrepancies remain approximately 3 degrees for the reverse spins. Estimated reaction distances for 90% success and their uncertainty quantify the maneuver trade-offs. The results support speed-specific empirical characterization of emergency maneuvers and distinguish encoder error from recovery motion and measurement-window mismatch.
Robotics (cs.RO); Systems and Control (eess.SY)
arXiv:2610.05607 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2610.05607v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05607 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 286 words
Related coverage
Problems of Proliferation
LessWrong · Sep 29, 2026

[AINews] Reality Checks on AI News (Yegge shuts down Gas Town, Databricks’ +60% Astra cost)
Latent Space · Sep 17, 2026
Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability-Based Safe Reinforcement Learning for Emergency Collision Avoidance
arXiv · Jun 16, 2026

SpaceX’s ambitious, expensive gamble to replace AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon
The Verge · Oct 17, 2026