Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

EmbodiedCLBench introduces the first benchmark for evaluating continual learning in embodied simulation environments, specifically testing an agent's ability to recombine basic skills into complex, unseen tasks. The study reveals that while prior experience consistently improves performance regardless of task complexity, current agents fail to scale effectively with additional learning samples, highlighting a critical bottleneck in self-evolving systems. This work establishes a foundational resource for advancing embodied AI research beyond non-embodied settings.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

EmbodiedCLBench: Evaluating Continual Learning for Self-Evolving Embodied Agents

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2610.13021v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continual learning requires models to accumulate past experience and transfer it to new tasks. Despite substantial research on continual learning, existing work remains largely confined to non-embodied settings, without extending to embodied environments. To address this gap, we introduce EmbodiedCLBench, the first benchmark in embodied simulation for evaluating the continual learning capability of self-evolving agents. With compositional generalization as the core evaluation principle, our benchmark evaluates whether agents can first learn from basic tasks and then recombine the acquired skills to solve complex, unseen advanced tasks. Based on EmbodiedCLBench, we conduct extensive experiments across multiple agent harnesses and learning methods, revealing consistent limitations and distinctive behaviors. Our results show that while advanced tasks can be hardly solved under zero-shot setting, the experience from basic tasks enables consistent improvement. Such benefit from the experience remains stable even if the task complexity increases. However, this improvement does not scale accordingly with the number of learning samples, and current agents cannot extract meaningful information from additional experience. Collectively, our findings highlight continual learning as a fundamental yet underexplored capability, and our benchmark offers valuable resources for designing effective self-evolving agents in embodied environments. Our code and dataset are available at https://pku-value-lab.github.io/EmbodiedCLBench-homepage.

Abstract:Continual learning requires models to accumulate past experience and transfer it to new tasks. Despite substantial research on continual learning, existing work remains largely confined to non-embodied settings, without extending to embodied environments. To address this gap, we introduce EmbodiedCLBench, the first benchmark in embodied simulation for evaluating the continual learning capability of self-evolving agents. With compositional generalization as the core evaluation principle, our benchmark evaluates whether agents can first learn from basic tasks and then recombine the acquired skills to solve complex, unseen advanced tasks. Based on EmbodiedCLBench, we conduct extensive experiments across multiple agent harnesses and learning methods, revealing consistent limitations and distinctive behaviors. Our results show that while advanced tasks can be hardly solved under zero-shot setting, the experience from basic tasks enables consistent improvement. Such benefit from the experience remains stable even if the task complexity increases. However, this improvement does not scale accordingly with the number of learning samples, and current agents cannot extract meaningful information from additional experience. Collectively, our findings highlight continual learning as a fundamental yet underexplored capability, and our benchmark offers valuable resources for designing effective self-evolving agents in embodied environments. Our code and dataset are available at this https URL.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2610.13021 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.13021v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.13021 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 304 words

Related coverage