Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper proposes "Hidden Code Sampling," a new quantum advantage protocol that solves the critical bottleneck of requiring exponential classical time for verification. By leveraging specific properties of quantum error correction codes, the authors demonstrate how to achieve efficient classical verification while maintaining complexity-theoretic hardness against simulation. The work also addresses practical noise characterization by constructing explicit code families capable of distinguishing between local coherent and Pauli noise channels.
Sources coveringarXiv, en.globes.co.il, ixbt.com, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Efficiently verifiable quantum advantage using error correction

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2510.05262v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: A key issue with existing quantum advantage experiments is that their verification requires exponential classical time. In this work, we address this challenge by designing a new proposal---Hidden Code Sampling---with efficient classical verification. We use properties of quantum error correction to build an experiment that is "conditionally peaked": conditioned on a subset of qubits, the distribution on another subset is peaked. We give evidence for the classical intractability of this protocol by showing complexity-theoretic hardness of classical simulation, putting our scheme on par with other quantum advantage schemes. A major hurdle in instantiating the scheme concerns distinguishing between two noise channels, one involving local coherent noise and the other involving local Pauli noise. We identify algebraic properties of the underlying codes that enable an efficient distinguisher and construct an explicit code family satisfying these properties while preserving the hardness guarantees. We provide further evidence for soundness of our verification tests by proving an exponential query lower bound for classical algorithms that pass our verification tests in a black-box model.

Abstract:A key issue with existing quantum advantage experiments is that their verification requires exponential classical time. In this work, we address this challenge by designing a new proposal---Hidden Code Sampling---with efficient classical verification. We use properties of quantum error correction to build an experiment that is "conditionally peaked": conditioned on a subset of qubits, the distribution on another subset is peaked. We give evidence for the classical intractability of this protocol by showing complexity-theoretic hardness of classical simulation, putting our scheme on par with other quantum advantage schemes. A major hurdle in instantiating the scheme concerns distinguishing between two noise channels, one involving local coherent noise and the other involving local Pauli noise. We identify algebraic properties of the underlying codes that enable an efficient distinguisher and construct an explicit code family satisfying these properties while preserving the hardness guarantees. We provide further evidence for soundness of our verification tests by proving an exponential query lower bound for classical algorithms that pass our verification tests in a black-box model.

48 pages, 12 figures. Comments welcome

Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Computational Complexity (cs.CC)

arXiv:2510.05262 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2510.05262v2 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2510.05262 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words

Related coverage