aiqbench analysis
This research advances high-dimensional statistics by improving sample complexity for learning truncated Boolean product distributions from $O(2^n)$ down to polylogarithmic scales under specific geometric conditions. By leveraging the concept of influence, the authors remove restrictive connectivity assumptions and eliminate the need for arbitrary parameterization sampling during inference. The work establishes new theoretical lower bounds that clarify intrinsic exponential dependencies on model width in constrained settings.
Efficient Learning of Truncated Boolean Product Distributions: Influence to the Rescue
arXiv:2607.22889v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Learning the natural parameters $z \in \mathbb{R}^n$ of discrete distributions $\mu_z$ from independent samples constrained to a subset $S \subseteq \{0,1\}^n$ is a foundational challenge in high-dimensional statistics. Existing methods for efficiently estimating truncated Boolean product distributions, notably the work of [Fotakis et al' COLT'20, Algorithmica '22], require either strong local connectivity assumptions on $S$ -- a property denoted fatness -- or stringent anti-concentration assumptions and necessitate the total mass of the truncation set to be a constant with respect to $n$. Moreover, the results in [Fotakis et al' COLT'20, Algorithmica '22] suffer from sample complexities that scale as $\Omega(2^n)$ if the mass of $S$ is exponentially small in $n$. In this work, we circumvent these limitations by analyzing the geometry of $S$ under the measure $\mu_z$. We refine the existing parameter estimation guarantees under the fatness assumption, improving the prior sample complexity to $O( \log n / \epsilon^2)$ for $\ell_\infty$-recovery, matching the untruncated minimax rate. We further generalize fatness using the notion of influence utilized in the analysis of Boolean functions and provide sufficient conditions for efficient inference. Notably, unlike previous work, our method does not require sampling at arbitrary parameterizations of the model. Lastly, we establish a theoretical lower bound demonstrating the sample complexity exhibits an intrinsic exponential dependence on the width of the model and the minimum distance between elements in the set.
Abstract:Learning the natural parameters $z \in \mathbb{R}^n$ of discrete distributions $\mu_z$ from independent samples constrained to a subset $S \subseteq \{0,1\}^n$ is a foundational challenge in high-dimensional statistics. Existing methods for efficiently estimating truncated Boolean product distributions, notably the work of [Fotakis et al' COLT'20, Algorithmica '22], require either strong local connectivity assumptions on $S$ -- a property denoted fatness -- or stringent anti-concentration assumptions and necessitate the total mass of the truncation set to be a constant with respect to $n$. Moreover, the results in [Fotakis et al' COLT'20, Algorithmica '22] suffer from sample complexities that scale as $\Omega(2^n)$ if the mass of $S$ is exponentially small in $n$. In this work, we circumvent these limitations by analyzing the geometry of $S$ under the measure $\mu_z$. We refine the existing parameter estimation guarantees under the fatness assumption, improving the prior sample complexity to $O( \log n / \epsilon^2)$ for $\ell_\infty$-recovery, matching the untruncated minimax rate. We further generalize fatness using the notion of influence utilized in the analysis of Boolean functions and provide sufficient conditions for efficient inference. Notably, unlike previous work, our method does not require sampling at arbitrary parameterizations of the model. Lastly, we establish a theoretical lower bound demonstrating the sample complexity exhibits an intrinsic exponential dependence on the width of the model and the minimum distance between elements in the set.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2607.22889 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2607.22889v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22889 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 328 words
Related coverage

SQL Data Types: Reference and Best Practices
Databricks · Sep 8, 2026
Untrusted advice for AI control: Short, strong advice significantly uplifts weak LLMs
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

The Entangled Dimensions of Decision Theory
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

Value generalisation Theory of Change: putting it into practice
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 31, 2026