Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This study reveals that compressing transcripts for Japanese medical videos degrades LLM performance by stripping away crucial conversational and affective cues needed to detect misinformation. While full transcripts yield the best results, even optimized compression methods like screening fail to match baseline accuracy, increasing the risk of misclassifying fake content as real. These findings are critical for deploying efficient yet reliable AI verification systems in high-stakes domains like healthcare.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Effects of Transcript Compression on LLM-based Medical Misinformation Detection in Japanese YouTube Videos

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.30882v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to assess long-form medical videos, but their effectiveness may depend on whether transcripts are provided in full or compressed through summarization, retrieval, or claim screening. This study examines how such transcript compression affects LLM-based veracity classification of Japanese medical YouTube videos. We compare four transcript input designs: full transcripts, LLM-generated summaries, RAPTOR-based retrievalaugmented generation (RAG), and Screening, which extracts candidate medical and health-related sentences. Using 74 long-form videos labeled as Real or Fake, we evaluate classification performance and analyze linguistic changes using J-LIWC, hedge expressions, and institutional or technical terms. The full-transcript Baseline achieved the best performance, whereas all compressed inputs increased false negatives, meaning that Fake videos were more likely to be misclassified as Real. Summary caused the largest performance drop, while Screening performed best among the compressed inputs but still omitted many medically relevant sentences. Linguistic analyses showed that these errors were not explained by a simple increase in certainty. Instead, Summary reduced affective, social, temporal, cognitive, and conversational cues, while Summary and RAG made institutional and technical terms more salient. These findings suggest that transcript compression can represent Fake videos as more coherent and authoritative inputs, thereby weakening cues needed for misinformation detection

Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to assess long-form medical videos, but their effectiveness may depend on whether transcripts are provided in full or compressed through summarization, retrieval, or claim screening. This study examines how such transcript compression affects LLM-based veracity classification of Japanese medical YouTube videos. We compare four transcript input designs: full transcripts, LLM-generated summaries, RAPTOR-based retrievalaugmented generation (RAG), and Screening, which extracts candidate medical and health-related sentences. Using 74 long-form videos labeled as Real or Fake, we evaluate classification performance and analyze linguistic changes using J-LIWC, hedge expressions, and institutional or technical terms. The full-transcript Baseline achieved the best performance, whereas all compressed inputs increased false negatives, meaning that Fake videos were more likely to be misclassified as Real. Summary caused the largest performance drop, while Screening performed best among the compressed inputs but still omitted many medically relevant sentences. Linguistic analyses showed that these errors were not explained by a simple increase in certainty. Instead, Summary reduced affective, social, temporal, cognitive, and conversational cues, while Summary and RAG made institutional and technical terms more salient. These findings suggest that transcript compression can represent Fake videos as more coherent and authoritative inputs, thereby weakening cues needed for misinformation detection

15 pages. Accepted at the 18th International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2026), Multidisciplinary Track, Short Paper

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.30882 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.30882v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30882 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 244 words

Related coverage