Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper advances quantum algorithms for solving differential equations by refining effective Hamiltonian constructions and comparing different function encodings like grid-value amplitudes versus spectral coefficients. The research addresses critical implementation details such as handling boundary conditions, mitigating ground-state degeneracy in nonlinear systems, and optimizing the spectral gap for solution recovery. These findings provide essential practical trade-offs for researchers developing variational quantum eigensolvers (VQE) or other ground-state-based approaches to scientific computing.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Effective-Hamiltonian Quantum Solvers for Differential Equations: Alternative Constructions and Function Encodings

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.26330v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Differential equations can be encoded as ground-state problems by constructing a positive-semidefinite effective Hamiltonian whose minimum-energy state represents the solution. We extend this framework in several directions. First, we show how multiple nonzero initial, boundary, and data conditions can be incorporated into the homogeneous formulation $A | f\rangle=0$ using a known nonzero reference condition. We then analyse an alternative formulation based on $A |f\rangle = | b\rangle$, with Hamiltonian $H_b=A^\dagger(I-|b\rangle\langle b|)A$, which incorporates source terms and nonzero constraints through an augmented system. For nonlinear differential equations, we examine the unphysical ground-state degeneracy introduced by tensor-product representations and consider both Hamiltonian constraints and ansatz-level restrictions for targeting physically valid product states. Finally, we develop grid-value amplitude-encoded versions of both Hamiltonian constructions and compare them with spectral coefficient encoding. Through linear and nonlinear examples, we assess how the choice of Hamiltonian formulation and function representation affects solution recovery, spectral gap, degeneracy, and readout. These results broaden the applicability of ground-state-based quantum differential-equation solvers while clarifying their principal practical trade-offs.

Abstract:Differential equations can be encoded as ground-state problems by constructing a positive-semidefinite effective Hamiltonian whose minimum-energy state represents the solution. We extend this framework in several directions. First, we show how multiple nonzero initial, boundary, and data conditions can be incorporated into the homogeneous formulation $A | f\rangle=0$ using a known nonzero reference condition. We then analyse an alternative formulation based on $A |f\rangle = | b\rangle$, with Hamiltonian $H_b=A^\dagger(I-|b\rangle\langle b|)A$, which incorporates source terms and nonzero constraints through an augmented system. For nonlinear differential equations, we examine the unphysical ground-state degeneracy introduced by tensor-product representations and consider both Hamiltonian constraints and ansatz-level restrictions for targeting physically valid product states. Finally, we develop grid-value amplitude-encoded versions of both Hamiltonian constructions and compare them with spectral coefficient encoding. Through linear and nonlinear examples, we assess how the choice of Hamiltonian formulation and function representation affects solution recovery, spectral gap, degeneracy, and readout. These results broaden the applicability of ground-state-based quantum differential-equation solvers while clarifying their principal practical trade-offs.

arXiv:2609.26330 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2609.26330v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26330 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 258 words

Related coverage