Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

EduAgentQG demonstrates how multi-agent frameworks can overcome the limitations of random model outputs in educational settings by enforcing explicit diversity and strict alignment with specific learning objectives. The system's closed-loop architecture of planning, evaluation, and refinement ensures generated math questions meet precise criteria for difficulty, knowledge concepts, and core competencies across grades 1-9. This approach marks a significant step toward reliable, personalized adaptive assessment tools powered by advanced AI orchestration.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

EduAgentQG: Multi-Agent Personalized Mathematics Question Generation with Explicit Diversity and Objective-Aware Evaluation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2511.11635v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: In intelligent education, personalized mathematics question generation aims to produce mathematics questions that satisfy educational requirements while supporting adaptive assessment and learning. Existing LLM-based single-agent and multi-agent methods improve generation flexibility, but they still tend to rely on aggregated feedback or model randomness, making it difficult to jointly ensure dimension-wise objective alignment and controllable diversity. To address these challenges, we propose EduAgentQG, a multi-agent collaborative framework for personalized mathematics question generation with explicit diversity and objective-aware evaluation. EduAgentQG organizes question generation as a closed-loop process of planning, writing, evaluation, refinement, and checking: structured generation plans and multiple generation directions guide candidate generation, while fine-grained evaluation verifies logical correctness, solvability, and objective alignment in knowledge concepts, difficulty, grade level, and core competencies. We first construct a mathematics question generation benchmark containing 10,273 questions across Grades 1-9, covering 634 knowledge concepts, 16 core competencies, and three difficulty levels; for evaluation, it is organized into two subsets: MathChoice, with 489 educational objectives for multiple-choice question generation, and MathBlank, with 500 educational objectives for fill-in-the-blank question generation. Experiments show that EduAgentQG consistently outperforms COT, COT$_N$, ReAct, and EQPR in diversity, Objective Consistency, and Win Rate.

Abstract:In intelligent education, personalized mathematics question generation aims to produce mathematics questions that satisfy educational requirements while supporting adaptive assessment and learning. Existing LLM-based single-agent and multi-agent methods improve generation flexibility, but they still tend to rely on aggregated feedback or model randomness, making it difficult to jointly ensure dimension-wise objective alignment and controllable diversity. To address these challenges, we propose EduAgentQG, a multi-agent collaborative framework for personalized mathematics question generation with explicit diversity and objective-aware evaluation. EduAgentQG organizes question generation as a closed-loop process of planning, writing, evaluation, refinement, and checking: structured generation plans and multiple generation directions guide candidate generation, while fine-grained evaluation verifies logical correctness, solvability, and objective alignment in knowledge concepts, difficulty, grade level, and core competencies. We first construct a mathematics question generation benchmark containing 10,273 questions across Grades 1-9, covering 634 knowledge concepts, 16 core competencies, and three difficulty levels; for evaluation, it is organized into two subsets: MathChoice, with 489 educational objectives for multiple-choice question generation, and MathBlank, with 500 educational objectives for fill-in-the-blank question generation. Experiments show that EduAgentQG consistently outperforms COT, COT$_N$, ReAct, and EQPR in diversity, Objective Consistency, and Win Rate.

Computers and Society (cs.CY); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2511.11635 [cs.CY]

(or arXiv:2511.11635v2 [cs.CY] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.11635 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 291 words

Related coverage