Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

EditPPT addresses the critical challenge of maintaining fidelity in long-form presentation editing by replacing open-ended code generation with a constrained, native COM interface approach. This multi-agent framework significantly reduces cascading errors and preserves user-authored structure through dual-modal validation, offering a robust solution for real-world document manipulation tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

EditPPT: Faithful Long-Deck Slide Editing via Structured Tool-Using Multi-Agent with Dual-Modal Validators

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.20381v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automating slide editing requires simultaneously satisfying modification accuracy, preservation fidelity, and robustness to deck length. Existing LLM-based systems often fail on real-world presentation files because they rely on idealized intermediate representations or open-ended code generation, which are prone to cascading errors in long decks. We introduce EditPPT, a multi-agent framework that reformulates slide editing as a constrained tool-selection problem. By executing localized shape-level operations through the native PowerPoint COM interface, EditPPT narrows the LLM action space while preserving the application-resolved structure of user-authored decks. By separating validation across modalities, our dual-modal validation provides more robust assessment of both instruction fidelity and visual quality. We also present DeckEdit-Bench, a benchmark with 28 human-authored decks, 582 slides, and 183 editing prompts across short, medium, and long deck tiers. Experiments show that EditPPT achieves a 99.5% execution rate, 88.7% slide-targeting F1, 82.5% instruction following, and 91.5% object preservation overall, while maintaining strong performance on long decks. Our code and benchmark are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/EditPPT-0E27/

Abstract:Automating slide editing requires simultaneously satisfying modification accuracy, preservation fidelity, and robustness to deck length. Existing LLM-based systems often fail on real-world presentation files because they rely on idealized intermediate representations or open-ended code generation, which are prone to cascading errors in long decks. We introduce EditPPT, a multi-agent framework that reformulates slide editing as a constrained tool-selection problem. By executing localized shape-level operations through the native PowerPoint COM interface, EditPPT narrows the LLM action space while preserving the application-resolved structure of user-authored decks. By separating validation across modalities, our dual-modal validation provides more robust assessment of both instruction fidelity and visual quality. We also present DeckEdit-Bench, a benchmark with 28 human-authored decks, 582 slides, and 183 editing prompts across short, medium, and long deck tiers. Experiments show that EditPPT achieves a 99.5% execution rate, 88.7% slide-targeting F1, 82.5% instruction following, and 91.5% object preservation overall, while maintaining strong performance on long decks. Our code and benchmark are available at this https URL

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)

arXiv:2608.20381 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2608.20381v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20381 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words

Related coverage