aiqbench analysis
This work introduces "Open Autoresearch," a collaborative framework combining human expertise with AI agents to optimize critical quantum circuits for Shor's algorithm. By benchmarking reversible secp256k1 point-addition operations, the study demonstrates an 86.1% reduction in the spacetime score compared to previous thresholds, marking significant progress toward practical quantum cryptanalysis. The results highlight how automated research paradigms can rapidly advance specific gate-level optimizations essential for future quantum computing capabilities.
ECDSA.Fail: Open Autoresearch for Optimizing Elliptic-Curve Point Addition in Shor's Algorithm
arXiv:2609.09582v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose Open Autoresearch, a paradigm in which humans and AI agents publish evaluator-verified improvements to a public leaderboard. We instantiate it in ECDSA.Fail, optimizing reversible secp256k1 point-addition circuits, a bottleneck in Shor's algorithm for elliptic-curve cryptography. The benchmark minimizes the spacetime-inspired score $S=Q\times T$, where $Q$ is peak logical qubit width and $T$ is average executed Toffoli count. Participants reduced $S$ by 86.1%. At the data cutoff (26 July 2026), the best-scoring circuit uses 1,151 qubits and 1,299,453 average executed Toffoli gates, giving $Q\times T\approx1.496$ billion. This is more than 50% below Google's published point-addition score thresholds (arXiv:2603.28846), under different accounting conventions. Because the benchmark supplies one addend classically, we construct a coherent windowed-addition-compatible variant implementing the single-call interface required by windowed Shor. It uses 1,162 qubits and 1,684,161 average executed Toffoli gates. On 100,000 random inputs, its empirical success probability is $\hat{p}=0.99809$, giving $Q\times T/\hat{p}\approx1.961$ billion under an independently rerunnable per-call sensitivity model, not a full-Shor success estimate. Its qubit and Toffoli counts lie below Google's published thresholds and Schrottenloher's reported operating points (arXiv:2606.02235), although differing interfaces, accounting conventions, and validation scope preclude formal dominance. After the cutoff, the score was further reduced to 1.259 billion, while a separate low-width circuit reached 813 qubits. The public record shows AI agents complementing human judgment, providing evidence for open autoresearch on efficiently evaluable, machine-checkable objectives.
Authors:Jieyi Long, Theodore Pender, Zhao Huang, Manuel B. Santos, Samrendra Kumar Singh, Bartosz Naskręcki, Bit Wonka, Joe Doyle, Pierre-Luc Dallaire-Demers, Francesco Giannicola, Ruben M. L. Paschoarelli, Oli Freuler, Jackie Chia-Hsun Lee, Vasily Gnuchev, Gopi Kannappan, John Boyer, Xavier Butler, Akash Balasubramani, Jordan Newman, Bereket Dereje, Alexander Hertlein, Robert Kodra, Lucas Levy, Shaan Patel, JT Rose, Matt Zweil, Okechukwu Wisdom, Tarek El-Eter, Edison Lee, Michael Dong, Alan Li, Anto Joseph, Gajesh Naik, Gautham Anant, Soubhik Deb, Justin Drake
Abstract:We propose Open Autoresearch, a paradigm in which humans and AI agents publish evaluator-verified improvements to a public leaderboard. We instantiate it in this http URL, optimizing reversible secp256k1 point-addition circuits, a bottleneck in Shor's algorithm for elliptic-curve cryptography. The benchmark minimizes the spacetime-inspired score $S=Q\times T$, where $Q$ is peak logical qubit width and $T$ is average executed Toffoli count. Participants reduced $S$ by 86.1%. At the data cutoff (26 July 2026), the best-scoring circuit uses 1,151 qubits and 1,299,453 average executed Toffoli gates, giving $Q\times T\approx1.496$ billion. This is more than 50% below Google's published point-addition score thresholds (arXiv:2603.28846), under different accounting conventions. Because the benchmark supplies one addend classically, we construct a coherent windowed-addition-compatible variant implementing the single-call interface required by windowed Shor. It uses 1,162 qubits and 1,684,161 average executed Toffoli gates. On 100,000 random inputs, its empirical success probability is $\hat{p}=0.99809$, giving $Q\times T/\hat{p}\approx1.961$ billion under an independently rerunnable per-call sensitivity model, not a full-Shor success estimate. Its qubit and Toffoli counts lie below Google's published thresholds and Schrottenloher's reported operating points (arXiv:2606.02235), although differing interfaces, accounting conventions, and validation scope preclude formal dominance. After the cutoff, the score was further reduced to 1.259 billion, while a separate low-width circuit reached 813 qubits. The public record shows AI agents complementing human judgment, providing evidence for open autoresearch on efficiently evaluable, machine-checkable objectives.
62 pages, 10 figures. Project website and latest results: this https URL and source code: this https URL
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
arXiv:2609.09582 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.09582v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09582 arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 344 words
Related coverage
Researchers And AI Agents Cut Estimated Quantum Cost of Attacking Bitcoin Encryption by 86%
The Quantum Insider · Sep 10, 2026
Lattice-Based Cryptography Explained
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 15, 2026
[AINews] High Taste Testers Ep. 1
Latent Space · Oct 17, 2026
[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026