aiqbench analysis
EBench introduces a granular diagnostic framework for generalist mobile manipulation models, moving beyond simple success rates to evaluate specific capability and generalization dimensions. The benchmark reveals distinct performance profiles across state-of-the-art architectures like $\pi_{0.5}$ and XVLA, offering critical insights into their strengths under distribution shifts. This work advances the field by providing actionable signals to refine the next generation of versatile robotic policies.
EBench: Elemental Diagnosis of Generalist Mobile Manipulation Policies
arXiv:2606.18239v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present EBench, a simulation benchmark that diagnoses generalist mobile manipulation policies beyond a single success-rate scalar. EBench comprises 26 diverse and challenging manipulation tasks annotated along 5 capability dimensions and 4 generalization dimensions. We evaluate state-of-the-art generalist manipulation models including $\pi_0$, $\pi_{0.5}$, XVLA, and InternVLA-A1, and reveal that the models exhibit strikingly different capability profiles: $\pi_{0.5}$ achieves the highest test success rate, the best train--test retention, and the strongest mobile manipulation performance; $\pi_0$ leads on dexterous fixed-base and high-precision tasks; XVLA and InternVLA-A1 exhibit complementary strengths across atomic skills and operating regimes. Beyond capability profiling, EBench analyzes the generalization ability from 4 representative perspectives, identifying the impact of different distribution shift factors. The results reveal strengths and weaknesses of models behind an overall score. We hope this benchmark offers a broad set of diagnostic signals to guide iteration on generalist manipulation models.
Abstract:We present EBench, a simulation benchmark that diagnoses generalist mobile manipulation policies beyond a single success-rate scalar. EBench comprises 26 diverse and challenging manipulation tasks annotated along 5 capability dimensions and 4 generalization dimensions. We evaluate state-of-the-art generalist manipulation models including $\pi_0$, $\pi_{0.5}$, XVLA, and InternVLA-A1, and reveal that the models exhibit strikingly different capability profiles: $\pi_{0.5}$ achieves the highest test success rate, the best train--test retention, and the strongest mobile manipulation performance; $\pi_0$ leads on dexterous fixed-base and high-precision tasks; XVLA and InternVLA-A1 exhibit complementary strengths across atomic skills and operating regimes. Beyond capability profiling, EBench analyzes the generalization ability from 4 representative perspectives, identifying the impact of different distribution shift factors. The results reveal strengths and weaknesses of models behind an overall score. We hope this benchmark offers a broad set of diagnostic signals to guide iteration on generalist manipulation models.
Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2606.18239 [cs.RO]
(or arXiv:2606.18239v3 [cs.RO] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.18239 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 234 words
Related coverage
EBench: Elemental Diagnosis of Generalist Mobile Manipulation Policies
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026
Cracking Mobile Manipulation: From Failure Diagnosis to Agentic Robot System
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026
ManiUnit: A Manipulation Skill Dataset and Benchmark for Long-Horizon Tasks
arXiv · Oct 9, 2026