Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper introduces the E$^2$M algorithm, which resolves analytical bottlenecks in tensor-based discrete density estimation by relaxing $\alpha$-divergence optimization into a tractable KL-divergence surrogate followed by closed-form updates via many-body approximation. The method supports flexible modeling across various low-rank structures like CP and Tensor Train formats while demonstrating robustness to outliers comparable to gradient-based procedures.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

E$^2$M: Double Bounded $\alpha$-Divergence Optimization for Tensor-based Discrete Density Estimation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2405.18220v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Tensor-based discrete density estimation requires flexible modeling and proper divergence criteria to enable effective learning; however, traditional approaches using $\alpha$-divergence face analytical challenges due to the $\alpha$-power terms in the objective function, which hinder the derivation of closed-form update rules. We present a generalization of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, called the E$^2$M algorithm. It circumvents this issue by first relaxing the optimization into the minimization of a surrogate objective based on the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, which is tractable via the standard EM algorithm, and subsequently applying a tensor many-body approximation in the M-step to enable simultaneous closed-form updates of all parameters. Our approach offers flexible modeling for not only a variety of low-rank structures, including the CP, Tucker, and Tensor Train formats, but also their mixtures, thus allowing us to leverage the strengths of different low-rank structures. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on synthetic and real datasets, highlighting its comparable convergence to gradient-based procedures, robustness to outliers, and favorable density estimation performance compared to prominent existing tensor-based methods.

Abstract:Tensor-based discrete density estimation requires flexible modeling and proper divergence criteria to enable effective learning; however, traditional approaches using $\alpha$-divergence face analytical challenges due to the $\alpha$-power terms in the objective function, which hinder the derivation of closed-form update rules. We present a generalization of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm, called the E$^2$M algorithm. It circumvents this issue by first relaxing the optimization into the minimization of a surrogate objective based on the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, which is tractable via the standard EM algorithm, and subsequently applying a tensor many-body approximation in the M-step to enable simultaneous closed-form updates of all parameters. Our approach offers flexible modeling for not only a variety of low-rank structures, including the CP, Tucker, and Tensor Train formats, but also their mixtures, thus allowing us to leverage the strengths of different low-rank structures. We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on synthetic and real datasets, highlighting its comparable convergence to gradient-based procedures, robustness to outliers, and favorable density estimation performance compared to prominent existing tensor-based methods.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2405.18220 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2405.18220v4 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.18220 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 265 words

Related coverage