aiqbench analysis
Composing insight from the full article — this may take a moment.
Dynamics of Stochastic Momentum with Sparse Updates in High Dimensions
arXiv:2605.28961v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Existing theory of momentum assumes that gradients arrive at every parameter at a roughly constant rate, an assumption violated in practice by heavy-tailed data distributions and modern architectures. We theoretically analyze the dynamics of two tractable models of momentum under sparse updates: a least squares model with sparse inputs and a logistic regression model with a rare class. Both admit exact closed-form second-moment dynamics whose high-dimensional limits we characterize across three scaling exponents for sparsity, batch size, and momentum decay. The phase structure on both problems is governed by the ratio of two intrinsic timescales: a momentum retention timescale (how many active updates the buffer survives) and a learning timescale (how many active updates it takes to reduce the squared error). When learning is much slower than retention, the limit matches SGD; when learning is faster, the system is unstable; where the timescales coincide, we recover classical heavy-ball dynamics. The oscillatory dynamics occur at different momentum values for different token sparsity, creating a spectral conflict for global momentum across token frequencies.
Abstract:Existing theory of momentum assumes that gradients arrive at every parameter at a roughly constant rate, an assumption violated in practice by heavy-tailed data distributions and modern architectures. We theoretically analyze the dynamics of two tractable models of momentum under sparse updates: a least squares model with sparse inputs and a logistic regression model with a rare class. Both admit exact closed-form second-moment dynamics whose high-dimensional limits we characterize across three scaling exponents for sparsity, batch size, and momentum decay. The phase structure on both problems is governed by the ratio of two intrinsic timescales: a momentum retention timescale (how many active updates the buffer survives) and a learning timescale (how many active updates it takes to reduce the squared error). When learning is much slower than retention, the limit matches SGD; when learning is faster, the system is unstable; where the timescales coincide, we recover classical heavy-ball dynamics. The oscillatory dynamics occur at different momentum values for different token sparsity, creating a spectral conflict for global momentum across token frequencies.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2605.28961 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2605.28961v2 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.28961 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words
Related coverage
FedSLoP: Memory-Efficient Federated Learning with Low-Rank Gradient Projection
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026

Quantifying User Behavior Patterns to Build Better Predictive Features
KDnuggets · Sep 2, 2026