Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical scaling bottleneck in LiDAR-equipped robot swarms by introducing a decentralized protocol for dynamic spatial code reuse. The proposed method significantly reduces the number of optical codes required compared to static assignment, offering substantial efficiency gains even under realistic conditions involving mobility and imperfect detection. By proving that coordinated reassignment outperforms reactive approaches, this work advances the theoretical limits of interference mitigation in dense multi-robot systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Dynamic, Decentralized Spatial Code Reuse for OCDMA LiDAR in Robot Swarms

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.28172v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Robots in a LiDAR-equipped swarm mutually interfere when their optical ranging codes collide. Existing mitigations either assign codes statically -- requiring $L=N$ distinguishable codes for $N$ robots -- or react to detected interference without a scalable, coordinated assignment rule beneath them; prior work explicitly identifies the code-assignment scaling problem as unsolved. We propose a decentralized protocol in which robots dynamically reassign spatial reuse codes based on a live, beacon-maintained interference-neighborhood graph, and prove that the number of codes required grows as $O(\log N/\log\log N)$ under constant robot density -- an unbounded improvement over the $\Theta(N)$ growth of static assignment. We validate this result under conditions substantially beyond the idealized proof -- robot mobility, imperfect beacon-based detection, and reactive reassignment -- via Monte Carlo simulation (30 seeds per condition, 95% confidence intervals): the advantage over static assignment widens from roughly $2\times$ at 15 robots to $12\times$ at 120. Against a structurally faithful, fairly constructed model of an existing coordination-free approach, our protocol achieves both substantially greater code-reuse efficiency and 30--40% lower collision risk under an identical, constrained code budget, demonstrating that coordination -- not merely reactivity -- is what closes the scaling gap.

Abstract:Robots in a LiDAR-equipped swarm mutually interfere when their optical ranging codes collide. Existing mitigations either assign codes statically -- requiring $L=N$ distinguishable codes for $N$ robots -- or react to detected interference without a scalable, coordinated assignment rule beneath them; prior work explicitly identifies the code-assignment scaling problem as unsolved. We propose a decentralized protocol in which robots dynamically reassign spatial reuse codes based on a live, beacon-maintained interference-neighborhood graph, and prove that the number of codes required grows as $O(\log N/\log\log N)$ under constant robot density -- an unbounded improvement over the $\Theta(N)$ growth of static assignment. We validate this result under conditions substantially beyond the idealized proof -- robot mobility, imperfect beacon-based detection, and reactive reassignment -- via Monte Carlo simulation (30 seeds per condition, 95% confidence intervals): the advantage over static assignment widens from roughly $2\times$ at 15 robots to $12\times$ at 120. Against a structurally faithful, fairly constructed model of an existing coordination-free approach, our protocol achieves both substantially greater code-reuse efficiency and 30--40% lower collision risk under an identical, constrained code budget, demonstrating that coordination -- not merely reactivity -- is what closes the scaling gap.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.28172 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.28172v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.28172 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 285 words

Related coverage