aiqbench analysis
DUET introduces a novel framework where the evaluation agent (grader) co-evolves alongside the task-solving agent, addressing the critical limitation of static evaluators in dynamic agentic workflows. By integrating grader updates directly into the optimization loop, this approach ensures that feedback mechanisms adapt to emerging failure modes rather than remaining fixed. This research advances the methodology for scaling autonomous agents by treating evaluation as a first-class objective rather than an afterthought.
DUET: Co-Evolving Solver and Grader Agents
arXiv:2610.04087v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agentic workflows are increasingly used across domains such as technology, finance, and enterprise operations. As these agents become more widely deployed, continually improving them becomes increasingly important. This raises an immediate challenge: How should the agent evolve? This evolution requires effective evaluation that can assess outcomes and provide useful feedback for optimization. As the agent evolves, its behaviors and failure modes may also change, making a fixed evaluator increasingly inadequate. Another fundamental question: How should we evaluate an evolving agent? These two challenges are inherently coupled; changes in agent behavior can expose limitations of the current evaluator, while a stronger evaluator provides more informative feedback for improving the agent. Motivated by this interaction, we introduce DUET, a framework that jointly optimizes a solver agent and a grader agent to improve both. DUET iteratively selects training tasks, executes them with the solver, evaluates the resulting outcomes with the grader, and uses a tool-using update module to revise the solver and the grader, alternating between the two across rounds. By updating the grader within the optimization loop, DUET turns evaluation from a fixed source of feedback into a first-class optimization objective that adapts alongside the solver. Experiments across four agent benchmarks show that DUET improves both solver and grader performance and consistently outperforms baselines that optimize the solver with a fixed grader.
Abstract:Agentic workflows are increasingly used across domains such as technology, finance, and enterprise operations. As these agents become more widely deployed, continually improving them becomes increasingly important. This raises an immediate challenge: How should the agent evolve? This evolution requires effective evaluation that can assess outcomes and provide useful feedback for optimization. As the agent evolves, its behaviors and failure modes may also change, making a fixed evaluator increasingly inadequate. Another fundamental question: How should we evaluate an evolving agent? These two challenges are inherently coupled; changes in agent behavior can expose limitations of the current evaluator, while a stronger evaluator provides more informative feedback for improving the agent. Motivated by this interaction, we introduce DUET, a framework that jointly optimizes a solver agent and a grader agent to improve both. DUET iteratively selects training tasks, executes them with the solver, evaluates the resulting outcomes with the grader, and uses a tool-using update module to revise the solver and the grader, alternating between the two across rounds. By updating the grader within the optimization loop, DUET turns evaluation from a fixed source of feedback into a first-class optimization objective that adapts alongside the solver. Experiments across four agent benchmarks show that DUET improves both solver and grader performance and consistently outperforms baselines that optimize the solver with a fixed grader.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.04087 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.04087v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04087 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 317 words
Related coverage
Evolving Ensemble of Agents
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026
HeurEvo: Agentic Evolution of Hybrid Solver-Augmented Heuristics for Time-Critical Mathematical Optimization
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026
Socratic-SWE: Self-Evolving Coding Agents via Trace-Derived Agent Skills
arXiv · Jun 8, 2026
Who Verifies the Verifier? Co-Evolving Inspectable Graders with Self-Improving Agents
arXiv · Oct 10, 2026