aiqbench analysis
This research establishes a theoretical framework for stabilizing Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) by modeling training dynamics as a competition between driving forces and decay effects. By unifying common empirical heuristics like masking ratios and EMA into a single stability ratio, the authors introduce ResidualPred to effectively increase representation rank and accuracy across standard benchmarks. The work provides essential theoretical grounding for preventing representation collapse in next-generation self-supervised learning models.
Drive vs. Decay: On the Training Dynamics of Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures
arXiv:2610.02344v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) are prone to representation collapse, typically mitigated through empirical heuristics. We develop an early-training stability theory that unifies these heuristics. Linearising the coupled JEPA gradient flow around the trivial fixed point reveals two competing effects: a driving force ($\gamma$) and a decay effect ($\sigma$). Under approximate spectral decoupling, a per-mode stability ratio $\mu_i = \gamma_i / \sigma_i$ factorises into independent data-side and predictor-side terms and the count of unstable modes tracks the rank of representations that can emerge. The framework predicts a phase boundary, which we confirm empirically across more than 800 Tabular-JEPA configurations. It also unifies predictor scaling, masking ratio, and EMA as distinct mechanisms for shifting $\mu$. Guided by this analysis, we introduce ResidualPred, a transformer predictor whose attention is biased toward the identity at initialisation; it improves both effective rank and downstream accuracy on tabular benchmarks and in I-JEPA pretraining on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, STL-10, and ImageNet. Our framework connects empirical collapse-avoidance heuristics to an explicit dynamical picture, yielding theory-driven stabilizers. Code is available at https://github.com/jose-melo/drive-vs-decay.
Title:Drive vs. Decay: On the Training Dynamics of Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures
Abstract:Joint-Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) are prone to representation collapse, typically mitigated through empirical heuristics. We develop an early-training stability theory that unifies these heuristics. Linearising the coupled JEPA gradient flow around the trivial fixed point reveals two competing effects: a driving force ($\gamma$) and a decay effect ($\sigma$). Under approximate spectral decoupling, a per-mode stability ratio $\mu_i = \gamma_i / \sigma_i$ factorises into independent data-side and predictor-side terms and the count of unstable modes tracks the rank of representations that can emerge. The framework predicts a phase boundary, which we confirm empirically across more than 800 Tabular-JEPA configurations. It also unifies predictor scaling, masking ratio, and EMA as distinct mechanisms for shifting $\mu$. Guided by this analysis, we introduce ResidualPred, a transformer predictor whose attention is biased toward the identity at initialisation; it improves both effective rank and downstream accuracy on tabular benchmarks and in I-JEPA pretraining on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, STL-10, and ImageNet. Our framework connects empirical collapse-avoidance heuristics to an explicit dynamical picture, yielding theory-driven stabilizers. Code is available at this https URL.
Accepted at NeurIPS 2026 (Main Track). 57 pages, 10 pages of main text; appendices and the NeurIPS paper checklist included. Code: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2610.02344 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.02344v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02344 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 303 words
Related coverage

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

World Models and Yann LeCun’s Bet Against Large Language Models
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jul 17, 2026

Modernizing and scaling support operations with generative AI on AWS
AWS · Sep 2, 2026
News Archive 2026
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026