DreamAvoid: Critical-Phase Test-Time Dreaming to Avoid Failures in VLA Policies

arXiv:2605.11750v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are often brittle in fine-grained manipulation, where minor action errors during the critical phases can rapidly escalate into irrecoverable failures. Since existing VLA models rely predominantly on successful demonstrations for training, they lack an explicit awareness of failure during these critical phases. To address this, we propose DreamAvoid, a critical-phase test-time dreaming framework that enables VLA models to anticipate and avoid failures. We also introduce an autonomous boundary learning paradigm to refine the system's understanding of the subtle boundary between success and failure. Specifically, we (1) utilize a Dream Trigger to determine whether the execution has entered a critical phase, (2) sample multiple candidate action chunks from the VLA via an Action Proposer, and (3) employ a Dream Evaluator, jointly trained on mixed data (success, failure, and boundary cases), to "dream" the short-horizon futures corresponding to the candidate actions, evaluate their values, and select the optimal action. We conduct extensive evaluations on real-world manipulation tasks and simulation benchmarks. The results demonstrate that DreamAvoid can effectively avoid failures, thereby improving the overall task success rate. Across four real-world tasks, DreamAvoid achieves 72.5% success, compared with 48.8% for the base policy and 54.4% for GPC-RANK. Our code is available at https://github.com/XianzheFan/DreamAvoid.

Abstract:Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are often brittle in fine-grained manipulation, where minor action errors during the critical phases can rapidly escalate into irrecoverable failures. Since existing VLA models rely predominantly on successful demonstrations for training, they lack an explicit awareness of failure during these critical phases. To address this, we propose DreamAvoid, a critical-phase test-time dreaming framework that enables VLA models to anticipate and avoid failures. We also introduce an autonomous boundary learning paradigm to refine the system's understanding of the subtle boundary between success and failure. Specifically, we (1) utilize a Dream Trigger to determine whether the execution has entered a critical phase, (2) sample multiple candidate action chunks from the VLA via an Action Proposer, and (3) employ a Dream Evaluator, jointly trained on mixed data (success, failure, and boundary cases), to "dream" the short-horizon futures corresponding to the candidate actions, evaluate their values, and select the optimal action. We conduct extensive evaluations on real-world manipulation tasks and simulation benchmarks. The results demonstrate that DreamAvoid can effectively avoid failures, thereby improving the overall task success rate. Across four real-world tasks, DreamAvoid achieves 72.5% success, compared with 48.8% for the base policy and 54.4% for GPC-RANK. Our code is available at this https URL.

Robotics (cs.RO); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2605.11750 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2605.11750v2 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.11750 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

aiqbench analysis

DreamAvoid: Critical-Phase Test-Time Dreaming to Avoid Failures in VLA Policies

Related coverage