aiqbench analysis
This research identifies a critical vulnerability in Large Reasoning Models where increased reasoning depth causes "Alignment Collapse," significantly degrading safety robustness against adversarial attacks. The authors attribute this failure to attention dilution during extended chain-of-thought processes and propose Reasoning Residual Alignment (RRA) as a lightweight mitigation strategy that dynamically re-emphasizes the original input. These findings are essential for developers balancing model capability with safety guarantees in next-generation reasoning systems.
Does Deeper Reasoning Compromise Alignment? Revealing and Mitigating of Alignment Collapse in Large Reasoning Models
arXiv:2609.08186v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The emergence of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has established a robust foundation for Large Reasoning Models (LRMs). While deep reasoning is widely believed to enhance safety alignment, the stability of alignment mechanisms under extended reasoning remains underexplored. This paper challenges the prevailing view by revealing a critical vulnerability: Deep Reasoning May Induce Alignment Collapse. To rigorously quantify this phenomenon, we propose the Alignment Loss Rate (ALR) metric. Our experiments demonstrate that as reasoning depth increases, ALR rises significantly, indicating a severe degradation in model robustness against external perturbations. Capitalizing on this instability, a novel jailbreaking paradigm, Reasoning Trap (RT), is proposed. RT induces the model into extended reasoning to amplify the impact of adversarial attacks, leading to a sharp decline in safety capabilities. To elucidate the mechanism behind this collapse, we identify Attention Dilution as the root cause, arising from the competition for attention between the extended reasoning process and the original input. To mitigate this, Reasoning Residual Alignment (RRA), a lightweight defense strategy that dynamically re-emphasizes the input via residual connections integrated with the reasoning process.
Title:Does Deeper Reasoning Compromise Alignment? Revealing and Mitigating of Alignment Collapse in Large Reasoning Models
Abstract:The emergence of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) has established a robust foundation for Large Reasoning Models (LRMs). While deep reasoning is widely believed to enhance safety alignment, the stability of alignment mechanisms under extended reasoning remains underexplored. This paper challenges the prevailing view by revealing a critical vulnerability: Deep Reasoning May Induce Alignment Collapse. To rigorously quantify this phenomenon, we propose the Alignment Loss Rate (ALR) metric. Our experiments demonstrate that as reasoning depth increases, ALR rises significantly, indicating a severe degradation in model robustness against external perturbations. Capitalizing on this instability, a novel jailbreaking paradigm, Reasoning Trap (RT), is proposed. RT induces the model into extended reasoning to amplify the impact of adversarial attacks, leading to a sharp decline in safety capabilities. To elucidate the mechanism behind this collapse, we identify Attention Dilution as the root cause, arising from the competition for attention between the extended reasoning process and the original input. To mitigate this, Reasoning Residual Alignment (RRA), a lightweight defense strategy that dynamically re-emphasizes the input via residual connections integrated with the reasoning process.
Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2609.08186 [cs.AI]
(or arXiv:2609.08186v1 [cs.AI] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.08186 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 288 words
Related coverage
Latent reasoning architectures would likely undermine CoT, our strongest oversight tool
AI Alignment Forum · Sep 23, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026

[AINews] not much happened today
Latent Space · Sep 18, 2026

Inside the suddenly explosive world of AI safety
The Verge · Sep 17, 2026