aiqbench analysis
This randomized controlled trial provides empirical evidence that prompt-to-design workflows using LLMs can reduce task completion times by approximately 20%, with particularly significant efficiency gains observed among product managers compared to professional designers. The study highlights a nuanced reality where AI accelerates prototyping for non-specialists, while benefits for expert designers remain highly dependent on specific task requirements. These findings offer critical insight into how generative AI is reshaping collaboration dynamics within the digital product design ecosystem.
Does AI Save Time on Product Design? A Randomized Controlled Experiment of AI Prompt-to-Design Workflows
arXiv:2609.26725v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: AI tools for digital product design now offer prompt-to-design capabilities, allowing designers and their non-designer colleagues to create prototypes through conversational workflows with large language models (LLMs). While these tools promise time savings, experimental evidence in product design remains limited compared with evidence from software engineering. We conducted a randomized controlled trial with 50 product designers and 50 product managers to evaluate prospective time savings from leveraging Figma Make in design work. Participants attempted three standardized design tasks with or without access to Figma Make. Among participants who completed the study tasks, access to Figma Make was associated with approximately 20% shorter completion times, with larger gains among product managers. Our findings suggest that prompt-to-design tools may enable product managers to further contribute to design work, while the benefits for professional designers may be task dependent.
Title:Does AI Save Time on Product Design? A Randomized Controlled Experiment of AI Prompt-to-Design Workflows
Abstract:AI tools for digital product design now offer prompt-to-design capabilities, allowing designers and their non-designer colleagues to create prototypes through conversational workflows with large language models (LLMs). While these tools promise time savings, experimental evidence in product design remains limited compared with evidence from software engineering. We conducted a randomized controlled trial with 50 product designers and 50 product managers to evaluate prospective time savings from leveraging Figma Make in design work. Participants attempted three standardized design tasks with or without access to Figma Make. Among participants who completed the study tasks, access to Figma Make was associated with approximately 20% shorter completion times, with larger gains among product managers. Our findings suggest that prompt-to-design tools may enable product managers to further contribute to design work, while the benefits for professional designers may be task dependent.
Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2609.26725 [cs.HC]
(or arXiv:2609.26725v1 [cs.HC] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26725 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 248 words
Related coverage
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026
Productionizing TurboQuant on AMD GPUs for KV-Cache-Bound LLM Inference
AMD · Jun 11, 2026
Untrusted advice for AI control: Short, strong advice significantly uplifts weak LLMs
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026