Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

DocuTeam introduces a mixed-initiative framework where AI agents proactively steer discussions based on document evolution, reducing the orchestration burden typically placed on users. Empirical results show that this iterative loop between user input and agent reactions significantly enhances the novelty and specificity of outcomes without increasing cognitive load. This advancement marks a shift from static tooling to dynamic, collaborative reasoning essential for complex problem-solving workflows.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

DocuTeam: Mixed-Initiative Multi-Agent Discussions around Evolving Documents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.29309v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In open-ended problem solving, collaborators often rely on discussion to surface concerns, challenge perspectives, and refine shared work as it evolves. While AI agents are increasingly used as discussion partners, existing multi-agent systems place a heavy burden on users to initiate and carefully orchestrate the discussions. We present DocuTeam, a mixed-initiative multi-agent discussion system in which both users and agents can initiate and steer conversations. Agents monitor document changes to proactively start and redirect discussions as the work evolves, while users can flexibly shape the conversation or adopt agent ideas. In a within-subjects study (N=20), participants using DocuTeam produced outcomes rated significantly more novel, relevant, and specific than with a baseline without any increase in cognitive load. Rather than using agents for one-off idea sourcing, participants engaged in an iterative refinement loop in which document changes prompted agent reactions, which led users to revisit and further develop their work.

Abstract:In open-ended problem solving, collaborators often rely on discussion to surface concerns, challenge perspectives, and refine shared work as it evolves. While AI agents are increasingly used as discussion partners, existing multi-agent systems place a heavy burden on users to initiate and carefully orchestrate the discussions. We present DocuTeam, a mixed-initiative multi-agent discussion system in which both users and agents can initiate and steer conversations. Agents monitor document changes to proactively start and redirect discussions as the work evolves, while users can flexibly shape the conversation or adopt agent ideas. In a within-subjects study (N=20), participants using DocuTeam produced outcomes rated significantly more novel, relevant, and specific than with a baseline without any increase in cognitive load. Rather than using agents for one-off idea sourcing, participants engaged in an iterative refinement loop in which document changes prompted agent reactions, which led users to revisit and further develop their work.

Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.29309 [cs.HC]

(or arXiv:2609.29309v1 [cs.HC] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29309 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 246 words

Related coverage