aiqbench analysis
This research identifies "previous-belief contamination" in streaming emotion models, where feeding prior predictions back as context severely distorts real-time audio perception. The authors propose EmoUpdate, a training-free framework that isolates current acoustic evidence from historical state to restore accuracy and balance across diverse benchmarks. This work offers critical insights for deploying reliable SpeechLMs in dynamic environments where maintaining an unbiased interpretation of ongoing speech is essential.
Do SpeechLMs Hear Their Own Opinions? Diagnosing and Mitigating Previous-Belief Contamination in Streaming Emotion Understanding
arXiv:2608.20769v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Streaming emotion understanding uses historical state while continuously interpreting current audio, often feeding the model's previous prediction back as context. We show that this history conditioning can distort current perception. On a balanced CREMA-D-Stream counterfactual diagnostic, changing only the injected previous emotion label while holding the audio fixed reduces current-audio accuracy from 72.50% to 30.42% and flips 65.69% of predictions. The effect is strongly label-asymmetric, with prior pull ranging from 4.76% to 98.20%, revealing a failure we call previous-belief contamination (PBC). To address PBC, we introduce EmoUpdate, a training-free framework that separates current-audio perception from historical state revision through three components: (1) a prior-blind acoustic firewall that prevents historical state from entering perception; (2) an evidence-shrunk causal belief filter that introduces history only after observation formation and retains label-asymmetric transition structure only when supported by observed evidence; and (3) a closed-form decontamination operator derived from the same counterfactual measurements for serving stacks where firewalling is unavailable. Across four SpeechLMs and two streaming emotion benchmarks, EmoUpdate achieves the best step accuracy and state-balanced accuracy in all eight model--benchmark settings, improving S-BAcc by up to 69.71 points and step accuracy by up to 38.41 points over the strongest controlled baselines.
Title:Do SpeechLMs Hear Their Own Opinions? Diagnosing and Mitigating Previous-Belief Contamination in Streaming Emotion Understanding
Abstract:Streaming emotion understanding uses historical state while continuously interpreting current audio, often feeding the model's previous prediction back as context. We show that this history conditioning can distort current perception. On a balanced CREMA-D-Stream counterfactual diagnostic, changing only the injected previous emotion label while holding the audio fixed reduces current-audio accuracy from 72.50% to 30.42% and flips 65.69% of predictions. The effect is strongly label-asymmetric, with prior pull ranging from 4.76% to 98.20%, revealing a failure we call previous-belief contamination (PBC). To address PBC, we introduce EmoUpdate, a training-free framework that separates current-audio perception from historical state revision through three components: (1) a prior-blind acoustic firewall that prevents historical state from entering perception; (2) an evidence-shrunk causal belief filter that introduces history only after observation formation and retains label-asymmetric transition structure only when supported by observed evidence; and (3) a closed-form decontamination operator derived from the same counterfactual measurements for serving stacks where firewalling is unavailable. Across four SpeechLMs and two streaming emotion benchmarks, EmoUpdate achieves the best step accuracy and state-balanced accuracy in all eight model--benchmark settings, improving S-BAcc by up to 69.71 points and step accuracy by up to 38.41 points over the strongest controlled baselines.
Sound (cs.SD); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.20769 [cs.SD]
(or arXiv:2608.20769v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20769 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 309 words
Related coverage
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 11, 2026
The Uncertainty That Matters Isn't Fundamental
LessWrong · Jun 12, 2026
Biological Superintelligence
LessWrong · Jul 30, 2026

LiveLaw Supreme Court Half-Yearly Digest: January - June 2026 [Part 2]
livelaw.in · Sep 13, 2026