Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates whether self-supervised speech models like HuBERT and wav2vec 2.0 truly encode word identity or merely rely on phonetic sequences. By disentangling phoneme information, the study demonstrates that these models do learn representations of words with reasonable fidelity independent of local phonetic content in their later layers. This finding clarifies the nature of linguistic abstraction in foundation models and suggests methods to enhance higher-order information for downstream tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Do speech foundation models really learn words?

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.10434v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Self-supervised speech foundation models are now used in a wide array of downstream applications, including traditional speech recognition and as the basis for tokens in speech-aware language models. Attempts to understand their usefulness have largely focused on probing their representations' ability to discriminate phonemes and words. However, discriminative ability for words need not imply specialized representation of words per se. Good discrimination of words may be explained by good encoding of word form (phonemes) rather than form-independent word representations encoding identity or syntactic/semantic properties. By partialling out phoneme information using residualization, we show that, in later layers, HuBERT and wav2vec 2.0 do in general learn representations which encode words with reasonable fidelity independently of local phonetic content. We show that this simple approach to disentanglement can enhance higher-order linguistic information in word discovery tasks.

Title:Do speech foundation models really learn words?

Abstract:Self-supervised speech foundation models are now used in a wide array of downstream applications, including traditional speech recognition and as the basis for tokens in speech-aware language models. Attempts to understand their usefulness have largely focused on probing their representations' ability to discriminate phonemes and words. However, discriminative ability for words need not imply specialized representation of words per se. Good discrimination of words may be explained by good encoding of word form (phonemes) rather than form-independent word representations encoding identity or syntactic/semantic properties. By partialling out phoneme information using residualization, we show that, in later layers, HuBERT and wav2vec 2.0 do in general learn representations which encode words with reasonable fidelity independently of local phonetic content. We show that this simple approach to disentanglement can enhance higher-order linguistic information in word discovery tasks.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Sound (cs.SD)

arXiv:2609.10434 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.10434v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.10434 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 238 words

Related coverage