aiqbench analysis
This research investigates whether multilingual encoders can generate consistent Semantic IDs (SIDs) for the same product across different languages, a critical requirement for reliable generative retrieval systems. The study finds that current multilingual models fail to maintain language-consistent discrete codes, with translation-induced shifts causing significant mismatches even when semantic distance is controlled. These findings highlight that simply using balanced codebooks or multilingual exposure is insufficient without specific architectural adjustments to ensure cross-lingual stability in compressed embeddings.
Do Multilingual Encoders Produce Language-Consistent Semantic IDs?
arXiv:2610.01139v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Semantic IDs (SIDs) compress item embeddings into discrete code sequences used in generative retrieval. We ask whether a multilingual encoder is sufficient for different-language renderings of the same product to receive language-consistent SIDs. Using Amazon ESCI listings rendered in English, Spanish, and Japanese, we test whether translations remain close to their English source, whether residual quantization is unusually sensitive to translation-induced movement, and whether multilingual or language-balanced quantizer fitting improves SID agreement. Multilingual E5 places translations measurably apart: under an English-heavy fit, a Japanese translation preserves the first SID code of its English counterpart in only 7.7% of cases, compared with 89.0% for an English rewording. Distance-matched product-directed controls produce nearly the same full-SID mismatch as translation, providing no evidence that the quantizer selectively amplifies language directions. Balancing the fitting mixture makes codebook use more uniform but further reduces cross-lingual prefix agreement: Spanish first-code consistency falls from 28.3% to 6.6%, while an English-only fit preserves it for 67.6% of Spanish translations. These results show that multilingual exposure and balanced codebook use alone do not guarantee language-consistent SIDs.
Title:Do Multilingual Encoders Produce Language-Consistent Semantic IDs?
Abstract:Semantic IDs (SIDs) compress item embeddings into discrete code sequences used in generative retrieval. We ask whether a multilingual encoder is sufficient for different-language renderings of the same product to receive language-consistent SIDs. Using Amazon ESCI listings rendered in English, Spanish, and Japanese, we test whether translations remain close to their English source, whether residual quantization is unusually sensitive to translation-induced movement, and whether multilingual or language-balanced quantizer fitting improves SID agreement. Multilingual E5 places translations measurably apart: under an English-heavy fit, a Japanese translation preserves the first SID code of its English counterpart in only 7.7% of cases, compared with 89.0% for an English rewording. Distance-matched product-directed controls produce nearly the same full-SID mismatch as translation, providing no evidence that the quantizer selectively amplifies language directions. Balancing the fitting mixture makes codebook use more uniform but further reduces cross-lingual prefix agreement: Spanish first-code consistency falls from 28.3% to 6.6%, while an English-only fit preserves it for 67.6% of Spanish translations. These results show that multilingual exposure and balanced codebook use alone do not guarantee language-consistent SIDs.
7 pages, 8 tables. Accepted as a short paper at WiNLP 2026, co-located with EMNLP 2026
Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2610.01139 [cs.IR]
(or arXiv:2610.01139v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.01139 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 298 words
Related coverage
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026

Best Free Image Generators on Hugging Face Right Now!
KDnuggets · Jun 9, 2026

Agent Evaluation Metric for multi-turn conversations
AWS · Sep 10, 2026

Newer Models, Same Advantage
Hugging Face · Jul 16, 2026