aiqbench analysis
This research evaluates the interpretability of location encoders by benchmarking their ability to recover spatially varying coefficients using GeoShapley across multiple geographic scales. The findings indicate that while primary effects are consistently captured, secondary spatial signals show significant degradation at global scales compared to local ones, suggesting raw coordinates remain a competitive baseline.
Do Location Encoders Capture Spatial Effects? A GeoShapley Benchmark Across Scales
arXiv:2606.23453v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Location encoders transform geographic coordinates into high dimensional embeddings for downstream machine learning, but it is unclear how well these representations capture interpretable spatial effects. We benchmark whether GeoShapley, a game-theoretic explainer that treats all location features as a single joint player, can recover spatially varying coefficients from models built on location-encoder embeddings. Eleven encoders from the TorchSpatial framework are evaluated against a synthetic process with known coefficients, across three scales (grid, county, global), with and without raw coordinates alongside the embedding, and under untrained and contrastively trained conditions. Measuring recovery as the correlation between estimated and true coefficients, we report how it varies with scale and encoder architecture and compare the embeddings against a raw-coordinate baseline. Recovery of the primary coefficient is consistently high across encoders, whereas recovery of a secondary coefficient is more scale-dependent, differing most at the global scale; the raw-coordinate baseline remains competitive throughout.
Title:Do Location Encoders Capture Spatial Effects? A GeoShapley Benchmark Across Scales
Abstract:Location encoders transform geographic coordinates into high dimensional embeddings for downstream machine learning, but it is unclear how well these representations capture interpretable spatial effects. We benchmark whether GeoShapley, a game-theoretic explainer that treats all location features as a single joint player, can recover spatially varying coefficients from models built on location-encoder embeddings. Eleven encoders from the TorchSpatial framework are evaluated against a synthetic process with known coefficients, across three scales (grid, county, global), with and without raw coordinates alongside the embedding, and under untrained and contrastively trained conditions. Measuring recovery as the correlation between estimated and true coefficients, we report how it varies with scale and encoder architecture and compare the embeddings against a raw-coordinate baseline. Recovery of the primary coefficient is consistently high across encoders, whereas recovery of a secondary coefficient is more scale-dependent, differing most at the global scale; the raw-coordinate baseline remains competitive throughout.
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.23453 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2606.23453v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.23453 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
https://doi.org/10.1145/3841645.3843391 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words
Related coverage

Introducing OlmoEarth embeddings: Custom embedding exports from OlmoEarth Studio for downstream analysis
Hugging Face · Aug 12, 2026

Introducing CARE-X: Towards Clinically Useful Radiology VLMs with Auxiliary Supervision, Reward-Aligned Learning, and Tool-Augmented Measurement
Microsoft Research · Aug 11, 2026

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026

NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano Omni Powers Multimodal Agent Reasoning in a Single Efficient Open Model
NVIDIA · Apr 28, 2026