aiqbench analysis
This controlled study exposes a critical gap in current retrieval systems, demonstrating that models often identify relevant documents but fail to verify whether they contain all required pieces of evidence for multi-part queries. The research highlights that condition-wise decomposition and lexical-visual fusion offer significant performance gains over generic reranking or simple scaling, identifying comprehensive coverage as the central bottleneck rather than just gold discovery.
Do Current Retrievers Cover All the Evidence? A Controlled Study of Conjunctive Cross-Page Retrieval
arXiv:2607.24165v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Finding a long document relevant to a multi-part request is not the same as establishing that it contains every requested piece of evidence. We study this gap for conjunctive document retrieval, where two or three explicit conditions must be supported on different pages of one document. We use n-Clue as a controlled measurement instrument: 1{,}000 queries over 2{,}021 documents pair all-condition golds with naturally occurring documents that satisfy only a subset, and a complete-first success requires a top-10 gold to precede every released subset qrel. Across 70 configurations, condition-wise decomposition improves two dense backbones by 6.8--7.3 points and lexical--visual fusion adds 8.7, while four generic rerankers all reduce Gold-NDCG; these directions replicate on a four-source stress set. Scaling one dense family from 0.6B to 8B changes complete-first success by 0.0 points. The strongest displayed hybrid illustrates the resulting gap: it finds a gold for 81.1\% of queries but succeeds complete-first on only 35.8\%, and the gap persists across condition count, target length, candidate density, query rendering, and the four-source stress set. Finally, page-aware visual systems surface stored support for every condition on only 5.1--5.3\% of queries. These results identify condition coverage, rather than gold discovery alone, as the central bottleneck.
Title:Do Current Retrievers Cover All the Evidence? A Controlled Study of Conjunctive Cross-Page Retrieval
Abstract:Finding a long document relevant to a multi-part request is not the same as establishing that it contains every requested piece of evidence. We study this gap for conjunctive document retrieval, where two or three explicit conditions must be supported on different pages of one document. We use n-Clue as a controlled measurement instrument: 1{,}000 queries over 2{,}021 documents pair all-condition golds with naturally occurring documents that satisfy only a subset, and a complete-first success requires a top-10 gold to precede every released subset qrel. Across 70 configurations, condition-wise decomposition improves two dense backbones by 6.8--7.3 points and lexical--visual fusion adds 8.7, while four generic rerankers all reduce Gold-NDCG; these directions replicate on a four-source stress set. Scaling one dense family from 0.6B to 8B changes complete-first success by 0.0 points. The strongest displayed hybrid illustrates the resulting gap: it finds a gold for 81.1\% of queries but succeeds complete-first on only 35.8\%, and the gap persists across condition count, target length, candidate density, query rendering, and the four-source stress set. Finally, page-aware visual systems surface stored support for every condition on only 5.1--5.3\% of queries. These results identify condition coverage, rather than gold discovery alone, as the central bottleneck.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
arXiv:2607.24165 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2607.24165v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24165 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 318 words
Related coverage

Brief independent investigation of agents’ behavior, reasoning and collaboration in the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident
METR · Aug 26, 2026
[AINews] AI Engineer NYC: Gemini 4 Argon, Vals AI Benchmarks
Latent Space · Oct 14, 2026
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 11, 2026
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026