Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Safety

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates whether Large Language Models inherently exhibit conspiratorial tendencies or can be easily conditioned to adopt such narratives through specific prompting strategies. The study highlights significant latent demographic biases and the susceptibility of these models to manipulation, offering critical insights for computational social science and safety protocols. These findings underscore the urgent need to evaluate higher-order psychological constructs in AI to mitigate risks associated with misinformation and institutional distrust.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Do Androids Dream of Unseen Puppeteers? Probing for a Conspiracy Tendencies in Large Language Models

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2511.03699v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit conspiratorial tendencies, whether they display socio-demographic biases in this domain, and how easily they can be conditioned into adopting conspiratorial perspectives. Conspiracy beliefs play a central role in the spread of misinformation and in shaping distrust toward institutions, making them an important testbed for assessing the social and psychological fidelity of LLMs and their potential to reproduce or reinforce harmful narratives. Although LLMs are often used as proxies for studying human behavior, it remains unclear whether they reproduce higher-order psychological constructs such as generalized conspiratorial beliefs. To bridge this research gap, we administer validated psychometric surveys measuring conspiratorial mindset to multiple models under different prompting and conditioning strategies. Our findings reveal that LLMs show partial agreement with elements of conspiracy belief, and conditioning with socio-demographic attributes produces uneven effects, exposing latent demographic biases. Moreover, targeted prompts can easily shift model responses toward conspiratorial directions, underscoring both the susceptibility of LLMs to manipulation and the potential risks of their deployment in sensitive contexts. These results highlight the importance of critically evaluating the psychological dimensions embedded in LLMs, both to advance computational social science and to inform possible mitigation strategies against harmful uses.

Title:Do Androids Dream of Unseen Puppeteers? Probing for a Conspiracy Tendencies in Large Language Models

Abstract:We investigate whether Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit conspiratorial tendencies, whether they display socio-demographic biases in this domain, and how easily they can be conditioned into adopting conspiratorial perspectives. Conspiracy beliefs play a central role in the spread of misinformation and in shaping distrust toward institutions, making them an important testbed for assessing the social and psychological fidelity of LLMs and their potential to reproduce or reinforce harmful narratives. Although LLMs are often used as proxies for studying human behavior, it remains unclear whether they reproduce higher-order psychological constructs such as generalized conspiratorial beliefs. To bridge this research gap, we administer validated psychometric surveys measuring conspiratorial mindset to multiple models under different prompting and conditioning strategies. Our findings reveal that LLMs show partial agreement with elements of conspiracy belief, and conditioning with socio-demographic attributes produces uneven effects, exposing latent demographic biases. Moreover, targeted prompts can easily shift model responses toward conspiratorial directions, underscoring both the susceptibility of LLMs to manipulation and the potential risks of their deployment in sensitive contexts. These results highlight the importance of critically evaluating the psychological dimensions embedded in LLMs, both to advance computational social science and to inform possible mitigation strategies against harmful uses.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY)

arXiv:2511.03699 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2511.03699v2 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.03699 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 311 words

Related coverage