aiqbench analysis
This research applies active learning with diversity-aware acquisition strategies to optimize materials science datasets, balancing immediate predictive performance with long-term utility for undiscovered properties. By integrating feature diversity and predictive disagreement into the selection process, the proposed NSGA-II framework effectively mitigates bias toward current objectives while preserving information critical for future discovery campaigns. The work demonstrates a practical method for constructing robust, unbiased datasets that enhance subsequent modeling efforts in computational materials science.
Diversity-Aware Active Learning Builds Materials Datasets for Current and Future Objectives
arXiv:2605.05104v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Materials science data collection can be expensive, making dataset reuse and long-term utility important for future discovery. In practice, data collection often prioritizes properties of current interest while other properties are excluded from the acquisition process. This can produce datasets that are well suited for current objectives but lose information needed for properties of future interest. Here, we present how to construct datasets that remain informative for both. We develop and evaluate acquisition frameworks that combine predictive disagreement with diversity in material features, predicted outcomes, or both. We test these approaches across four DFT datasets and an experimental thermoelectric dataset. Diversity inclusion in dataset construction can reduce present and future objectives trade-off by preserving a broader range of materials and property behavior during acquisition. Across all datasets, the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II with disagreements and feature diversity (NSGA-II Dis. + diversity) framework developed in this work provides the most robust balance between current and future objectives. It maintains prediction performance above random sampling for current objectives while mitigating bias on excluded properties and, in many cases, improving their performance beyond random sampling. This diversity-aware acquisition framework provides a practical route to building materials datasets with unbiased quality entries and mitigating cold-start limitations in subsequent modeling and discovery campaigns.
Abstract:Materials science data collection can be expensive, making dataset reuse and long-term utility important for future discovery. In practice, data collection often prioritizes properties of current interest while other properties are excluded from the acquisition process. This can produce datasets that are well suited for current objectives but lose information needed for properties of future interest. Here, we present how to construct datasets that remain informative for both. We develop and evaluate acquisition frameworks that combine predictive disagreement with diversity in material features, predicted outcomes, or both. We test these approaches across four DFT datasets and an experimental thermoelectric dataset. Diversity inclusion in dataset construction can reduce present and future objectives trade-off by preserving a broader range of materials and property behavior during acquisition. Across all datasets, the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II with disagreements and feature diversity (NSGA-II Dis. + diversity) framework developed in this work provides the most robust balance between current and future objectives. It maintains prediction performance above random sampling for current objectives while mitigating bias on excluded properties and, in many cases, improving their performance beyond random sampling. This diversity-aware acquisition framework provides a practical route to building materials datasets with unbiased quality entries and mitigating cold-start limitations in subsequent modeling and discovery campaigns.
Materials Science (cond-mat.mtrl-sci); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Databases (cs.DB); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Applications (stat.AP)
arXiv:2605.05104 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]
(or arXiv:2605.05104v2 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.05104 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 311 words
Related coverage

Research Note: Filtering Subversion-Relevant Information From Pretraining Data Is Feasible
LessWrong · Oct 5, 2026

A Candid Abacus AI Review: The All-in-One AI Platform for Professionals & Enterprises
KDnuggets · Sep 10, 2026

Concrete Evaluations to Investigate the OpenAI Model That Hacked Hugging Face
AI Alignment Forum · Aug 3, 2026

PIRAMID: Progress and Plans
LessWrong · Jul 27, 2026