Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research establishes architecture-aware convergence bounds for selective state space models (SSMs) like Mamba2 within federated learning environments, addressing a critical gap where standard methods ignore SSM-specific dynamics such as recurrent stability and input-dependent discretization. By deriving theoretical limits for FedAvg and FedProx and validating them empirically across multiple text domains, the study provides a rigorous foundation for optimizing distributed training of next-generation sequence models.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Distributed Learning with Selective State Space Models: Architecture-Aware Convergence Analysis

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.02659v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Modern state space models (SSMs), such as Mamba2, provide a compelling alternative to transformers by combining linear-time sequence modeling with recurrent state-space dynamics. However, the behavior of SSMs in distributed learning settings remains poorly understood. In particular, the existing standard federated learning methods are largely architecture-agnostic, and do not account for the stability, selectivity, and state-space parameterization that characterize modern selective SSMs. To address this, we derive architecture-aware gradient and smoothness bounds for single- and multi-layer selective SSMs, and convergence bounds for FedAvg and FedProx, characterizing how recurrent stability, input-dependent discretization, and state projection norms affect federated optimization. We then numerically validate the single-layer bounds on sequences generated by a teacher SSM, using a learner that follows the analyzed recurrence. We use this analysis to formulate expectations about the effects of local training and client heterogeneity, and examine these expectations by comparing nine federated learning algorithms on Mamba2 language modeling across six text domains. These experiments illustrate how SSM-specific bounds can provide a basis for interpreting the behavior of practical federated learning algorithms.

Abstract:Modern state space models (SSMs), such as Mamba2, provide a compelling alternative to transformers by combining linear-time sequence modeling with recurrent state-space dynamics. However, the behavior of SSMs in distributed learning settings remains poorly understood. In particular, the existing standard federated learning methods are largely architecture-agnostic, and do not account for the stability, selectivity, and state-space parameterization that characterize modern selective SSMs. To address this, we derive architecture-aware gradient and smoothness bounds for single- and multi-layer selective SSMs, and convergence bounds for FedAvg and FedProx, characterizing how recurrent stability, input-dependent discretization, and state projection norms affect federated optimization. We then numerically validate the single-layer bounds on sequences generated by a teacher SSM, using a learner that follows the analyzed recurrence. We use this analysis to formulate expectations about the effects of local training and client heterogeneity, and examine these expectations by comparing nine federated learning algorithms on Mamba2 language modeling across six text domains. These experiments illustrate how SSM-specific bounds can provide a basis for interpreting the behavior of practical federated learning algorithms.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Optimization and Control (math.OC)

arXiv:2610.02659 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2610.02659v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.02659 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 274 words

Related coverage