Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces BEAR, a new benchmark that breaks down embodied AI tasks into 14 atomic skills to diagnose specific capability bottlenecks like unstable spatiotemporal modeling. The study reveals that perceptual limitations are primary drivers of reasoning failures in current multimodal models and proposes BEAR-Agent as an augmented solution for robotic applications. By shifting focus from coarse task-level metrics to fine-grained skill evaluation, this work provides a clearer roadmap for advancing embodied intelligence beyond simulation environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Dissecting Embodied Abilities in Multimodal Language Models through Skill-level Evaluation and Diagnosis

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2510.08759v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Understanding the capability bottlenecks of embodied multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is crucial for improving embodied agents. However, existing embodied benchmarks mainly focus on task-level evaluation and fail to provide actionable insights into the underlying causes of model failures. To address this limitation, we introduce BEAR, a benchmark that decomposes embodied tasks into 14 atomic skills for fine-grained skill-level evaluation. BEAR comprises 4,469 interleaved image-video-text samples spanning 14 skills across 6 categories, ranging from low-level perception to high-level planning. We evaluate 20 MLLMs on BEAR under a hierarchical skill-level diagnosis framework and uncover two key findings: (1) perceptual capabilities are major bottlenecks behind reasoning failures, and (2) current models suffer from unstable spatiotemporal modeling that remains largely unexposed in prior benchmarks. Motivated by these findings, we further propose BEAR-Agent, a multimodal conversational agent that augments MLLMs with visual and spatial reasoning tools. BEAR-Agent substantially improves performance across embodied skills, achieving a relative improvement of 17.5% on GPT-5 over the base model on BEAR, while also outperforming strong baselines in both simulation and real-world robotic experiments. Project page: https://bear-official66.github.io/

Authors:Yu Qi, Haibo Zhao, Ziyu Guo, Siyuan Ma, Ziyan Chen, Yaokun Han, Renrui Zhang, Zitiantao Lin, Yizhe Zhu, Shiji Xin, Yijian Huang, Boce Hu, Kai Cheng, Peiheng Wang, Jiazheng Liu, Jiayi Zhang, Yizhe Zhu, Wenqing Wang, Yiran Qin, Haojie Huang, Lawson L.S. Wong

Abstract:Understanding the capability bottlenecks of embodied multimodal large language models (MLLMs) is crucial for improving embodied agents. However, existing embodied benchmarks mainly focus on task-level evaluation and fail to provide actionable insights into the underlying causes of model failures. To address this limitation, we introduce BEAR, a benchmark that decomposes embodied tasks into 14 atomic skills for fine-grained skill-level evaluation. BEAR comprises 4,469 interleaved image-video-text samples spanning 14 skills across 6 categories, ranging from low-level perception to high-level planning. We evaluate 20 MLLMs on BEAR under a hierarchical skill-level diagnosis framework and uncover two key findings: (1) perceptual capabilities are major bottlenecks behind reasoning failures, and (2) current models suffer from unstable spatiotemporal modeling that remains largely unexposed in prior benchmarks. Motivated by these findings, we further propose BEAR-Agent, a multimodal conversational agent that augments MLLMs with visual and spatial reasoning tools. BEAR-Agent substantially improves performance across embodied skills, achieving a relative improvement of 17.5% on GPT-5 over the base model on BEAR, while also outperforming strong baselines in both simulation and real-world robotic experiments. Project page: this https URL

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2510.08759 [cs.CV]

(or arXiv:2510.08759v3 [cs.CV] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 239 words

Related coverage