Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research investigates the alignment between AI-driven acoustic biomarkers for Alzheimer's detection and human perceptual cues across different languages and genders. The study reveals a critical failure mode where global explainability methods mask significant demographic divergences, particularly in Greek-speaking male populations where models fail to exceed chance levels. These findings underscore the urgent need for population-specific auditing and tailored interpretability strategies before deploying clinical speech AI systems broadly.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Disentangling Acoustic Cues in Alzheimer's Pathology and Perception: The Roles of Language and Gender

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.23977v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Acoustic biomarkers show promise for detecting Alzheimer's Disease (AD), yet whether the cues driving diagnostic AI align with those salient to human listeners is underexplored across languages and genders, where pathological markers and perceptual strategies differ. We train models to predict clinical AD status (pathology) and human perceptual scores across Mandarin and Greek, male and female speakers. Using SHAP for interpretability and statistical models for validation, we compare feature importance by subgroup. Results reveal a context-dependent divergence: pathological-perceptual alignment is significant for Mandarin and female speakers but disappears for Greek and male speakers, where pathology models did not exceed chance; this is a failure mode that population-specific auditing surfaces. Global Explainable AI (XAI) explanations can mask critical demographic divergences, highlighting the need for population-specific explainability auditing for equitable deployment of clinical speech AI.

Abstract:Acoustic biomarkers show promise for detecting Alzheimer's Disease (AD), yet whether the cues driving diagnostic AI align with those salient to human listeners is underexplored across languages and genders, where pathological markers and perceptual strategies differ. We train models to predict clinical AD status (pathology) and human perceptual scores across Mandarin and Greek, male and female speakers. Using SHAP for interpretability and statistical models for validation, we compare feature importance by subgroup. Results reveal a context-dependent divergence: pathological-perceptual alignment is significant for Mandarin and female speakers but disappears for Greek and male speakers, where pathology models did not exceed chance; this is a failure mode that population-specific auditing surfaces. Global Explainable AI (XAI) explanations can mask critical demographic divergences, highlighting the need for population-specific explainability auditing for equitable deployment of clinical speech AI.

Sound (cs.SD); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2607.23977 [cs.SD]

(or arXiv:2607.23977v1 [cs.SD] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23977 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 229 words

Related coverage