aiqbench analysis
This research introduces nested sequential Monte Carlo methods to improve inference-time control in discrete diffusion models, effectively addressing issues like overoptimism and weight degeneracy found in prior particle-based approaches. By correcting biases in Feynman-Kac steering formulations, the proposed NSMC and FA-NSMC techniques demonstrate superior performance in steering text generation toward specific sequence-level rewards without requiring model retraining.
Discrete Diffusion Inference-Time Control with Nested Sequential Monte Carlo
arXiv:2608.20123v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study inference-time control for text generation in discrete diffusion language models, where the goal is to steer sampling toward sequence-level rewards without retraining. Prior work in this domain has focused on particle-based methods such as best-of-$n$ sampling and bootstrap sequential Monte Carlo, which may suffer from overoptimism and weight degeneracy, respectively. We address these limitations using \emph{nested} sequential Monte Carlo methods. We formulate nested SMC (NSMC) and fully-adapted nested SMC (FA-NSMC) for Feynman--Kac steering, identifying and correcting errors in prior formulations that lead to biased final estimates. We evaluate these methods on toxicity and fluency steering tasks, showing that NSMC and FA-NSMC consistently outperform best-of-$n$ and bootstrap SMC.
Abstract:We study inference-time control for text generation in discrete diffusion language models, where the goal is to steer sampling toward sequence-level rewards without retraining. Prior work in this domain has focused on particle-based methods such as best-of-$n$ sampling and bootstrap sequential Monte Carlo, which may suffer from overoptimism and weight degeneracy, respectively. We address these limitations using \emph{nested} sequential Monte Carlo methods. We formulate nested SMC (NSMC) and fully-adapted nested SMC (FA-NSMC) for Feynman--Kac steering, identifying and correcting errors in prior formulations that lead to biased final estimates. We evaluate these methods on toxicity and fluency steering tasks, showing that NSMC and FA-NSMC consistently outperform best-of-$n$ and bootstrap SMC.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.20123 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2608.20123v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.20123 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 206 words
Related coverage
FluxLite: Inference-Time Proposal Control for Discrete Diffusion Models
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026

Opaque recurrence, and other AI terms that you should probably know
TechCrunch · Sep 7, 2026

Implementing and Evaluating a Basic Per-Action Monitor for Safer Evals
METR · Sep 27, 2026

The Machines that Make the Machines
NVIDIA · Oct 7, 2026