aiqbench analysis
This research introduces Direct Hidden-State Alignment (DHSA), a method that controls LLM preference expression by intervening in inference-time hidden states rather than retraining model weights. By mapping behavioral preferences onto causal effects of native residual computation, the proposed technique achieves performance comparable to standard DPO while using significantly fewer parameters and allowing dynamic enablement at runtime. This approach offers a promising direction for efficient alignment and fine-tuning without compromising the base model's foundational capabilities.
Direct Hidden-State Alignment: Mapping and Controlling Preference Expression in LLMs
arXiv:2609.33298v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In many settings, post-training need not create the target behavior from scratch: the base model can already produce it, but not reliably. This shifts part of preference alignment from capability acquisition to behavioral expression. We ask how a specified preference is represented in native model computation, what prevents target-supporting computation from reliably dominating generation, and whether this structure can directly guide control. We introduce Residual Competition Maps (RCMs), which map a behavioral preference onto signed causal effects of native residual computation. Across preference domains, RCMs reveal coexisting target-supporting and target-competing effects, input-dependent component roles, and cases where a single native-component intervention reverses the preference outcome. DPO substantially reorganizes these effects and can weaken opposition without guaranteeing its removal. We then propose Direct Hidden-State Alignment (DHSA), which treats inference-time hidden states rather than base-model weights as the direct adaptation space. RCM-guided Causal Activation State Transition (CAST) implements DHSA through local state interventions at a small number of preference-relevant interfaces while freezing the base model. With only 256-16,384 controller parameters, CAST reaches DPO-competitive operating points across three preference domains, can complement DPO-trained models, and can be enabled or removed at inference time.
Abstract:In many settings, post-training need not create the target behavior from scratch: the base model can already produce it, but not reliably. This shifts part of preference alignment from capability acquisition to behavioral expression. We ask how a specified preference is represented in native model computation, what prevents target-supporting computation from reliably dominating generation, and whether this structure can directly guide control. We introduce Residual Competition Maps (RCMs), which map a behavioral preference onto signed causal effects of native residual computation. Across preference domains, RCMs reveal coexisting target-supporting and target-competing effects, input-dependent component roles, and cases where a single native-component intervention reverses the preference outcome. DPO substantially reorganizes these effects and can weaken opposition without guaranteeing its removal. We then propose Direct Hidden-State Alignment (DHSA), which treats inference-time hidden states rather than base-model weights as the direct adaptation space. RCM-guided Causal Activation State Transition (CAST) implements DHSA through local state interventions at a small number of preference-relevant interfaces while freezing the base model. With only 256-16,384 controller parameters, CAST reaches DPO-competitive operating points across three preference domains, can complement DPO-trained models, and can be enabled or removed at inference time.
32 pages, 7 figures. Code: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.33298 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.33298v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.33298 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 292 words
Related coverage
The J-Space Debate, Agent Swarms, and Pacing Frontier AI - Digital Minds Newsletter #4
LessWrong · Sep 18, 2026
The current bottleneck is political will, not research
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 11, 2026

Koopman Theory and Metaethics
LessWrong · Sep 19, 2026
J++ Lens: Jacobian Filtering Enables More Faithful Workspace Lenses
LessWrong · Oct 8, 2026