Skip to content
aiqbench takeWritten by an AI model; may contain errors — check the source.AI Products

aiqbench analysis

This study validates that Principal Component Analysis (PCA) effectively maintains classification accuracy in cyberattack detection even under aggressive feature compression, offering a viable path to reducing computational complexity. While Linear Predictive Coding (LPC) remains competitive, it exhibits slightly higher performance degradation compared to PCA. These findings provide a practical framework for optimizing machine learning models in resource-constrained cybersecurity environments.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Dimensionality Reduction for Cyberattack Classification: A Comparative Evaluation of PCA and Linear Predictive Coding

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2606.05584v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: High-dimensional feature representations are widely used in machine learning-based cyberattack detection systems. However, they increase computational complexity and may hinder deployment in resource-constrained environments. In this paper, we investigate feature compression techniques for cyberattack classification by comparing two dimensionality reduction approaches: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Predictive Coding (LPC). Compressed feature representations with varying dimensionalities are generated and evaluated across several classification models. Experimental analysis demonstrates that PCA preserves classification performance even under aggressive compression. On the other hand, LPC provides competitive predictive representations with slightly larger performance degradation. The results show that substantial reductions in feature dimensionality can be achieved with minimal impact on classification accuracy, highlighting the potential of lightweight feature compression for efficient cybersecurity analytics.

Abstract:High-dimensional feature representations are widely used in machine learning-based cyberattack detection systems. However, they increase computational complexity and may hinder deployment in resource-constrained environments. In this paper, we investigate feature compression techniques for cyberattack classification by comparing two dimensionality reduction approaches: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Predictive Coding (LPC). Compressed feature representations with varying dimensionalities are generated and evaluated across several classification models. Experimental analysis demonstrates that PCA preserves classification performance even under aggressive compression. On the other hand, LPC provides competitive predictive representations with slightly larger performance degradation. The results show that substantial reductions in feature dimensionality can be achieved with minimal impact on classification accuracy, highlighting the potential of lightweight feature compression for efficient cybersecurity analytics.

Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2606.05584 [cs.CR]

(or arXiv:2606.05584v1 [cs.CR] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05584 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 217 words

Related coverage