aiqbench analysis
This research establishes rigorous Rényi-Differential Privacy (RDP) bounds for releasing Gaussian Process posterior samples, demonstrating how intrinsic model randomness can inherently protect training data without external noise injection. The study quantifies the trade-off between privacy leakage and utility across different regularisation regimes, offering a novel "privacy knob" via calibrated GP noise when stricter guarantees are required.
Differential Privacy of Gaussian Process Posterior Sampling
arXiv:2606.17995v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study the privacy of releasing posterior sample paths from a Gaussian process (GP) when the entire training set including covariates and responses is private. Unlike standard differential-privacy (DP) mechanisms that add external noise, posterior sampling is random by construction. We show that this intrinsic randomness yields DP guarantees by deriving explicit R\'enyi-DP bounds for GP posterior sample-path release. The bounds separate posterior-mean leakage from data-dependent posterior-covariance leakage showing that meaningful privacy depends sharply on effective ridge regularisation. We apply membership-inference attacks to show that empirical leakage follows the predicted dependence on regularisation, posterior variance and the number of released posterior sample-paths. Utility experiments on downstream posterior-sampling tasks identify noisy-observation regimes where privacy-compatible regularisation preserves useful decisions with modest utility loss. When stronger privacy is needed, the intrinsic guarantee can be sharpened by adding calibrated GP noise, providing an explicit additional privacy knob.
Abstract:We study the privacy of releasing posterior sample paths from a Gaussian process (GP) when the entire training set including covariates and responses is private. Unlike standard differential-privacy (DP) mechanisms that add external noise, posterior sampling is random by construction. We show that this intrinsic randomness yields DP guarantees by deriving explicit Rényi-DP bounds for GP posterior sample-path release. The bounds separate posterior-mean leakage from data-dependent posterior-covariance leakage showing that meaningful privacy depends sharply on effective ridge regularisation. We apply membership-inference attacks to show that empirical leakage follows the predicted dependence on regularisation, posterior variance and the number of released posterior sample-paths. Utility experiments on downstream posterior-sampling tasks identify noisy-observation regimes where privacy-compatible regularisation preserves useful decisions with modest utility loss. When stronger privacy is needed, the intrinsic guarantee can be sharpened by adding calibrated GP noise, providing an explicit additional privacy knob.
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2606.17995 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2606.17995v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.17995 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 244 words
Related coverage
Differential Privacy of Gaussian Process Posterior Sampling
arXiv · Sep 15, 2026
Exploiting Gradients in Bayesian Inference of Expensive Simulators
arXiv · Oct 9, 2026
StochLOB: Heavy-Tailed Score Matching for Robust Limit Order Book Trend Prediction
arXiv · Oct 16, 2026
Physics-informed diffusion models in spectral space
arXiv · Jun 3, 2026