Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces differentiable dynamics models (DiffKBM and DiffGM3) that accurately capture complex micro-mobility characteristics like tire slip and friction, enabling end-to-end optimization for autonomous scooters and wheelchairs. By integrating these models into differentiable autonomy stacks, the study demonstrates significant improvements in trajectory matching and collision reduction within crowded pedestrian environments. This work advances the foundational modeling required for safe, gradient-based control systems in low-speed shared spaces.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Differentiable Dynamics for Autonomous Micro-Mobility Navigation

arXiv3 min read

arXiv:2609.31885v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous micro-mobility vehicles (MMVs) such as wheelchairs, scooters, and bicycles have the potential to improve mobility access and support safe low-speed transportation in pedestrian-shared spaces. Achieving MMV autonomy will require realistic, predictable MMV motion. However, many existing autonomous vehicle stacks rely on simplified kinematic models that fail to capture key MMV characteristics such as tire slip, friction, and wheel layouts, limiting realism and gradient-based optimization. In this paper, we explore differentiable formulations of dynamics models for autonomous micro-mobility systems. We first construct DiffKBM, a differentiable version of the kinematic bicycle model (KBM). Then, we introduce DiffGM3, a differentiable formulation of the General Micro-Mobility Model (GM3), a unified tire-based dynamics formulation for micro-mobility vehicles that supports a wide range of MMV configurations. DiffKBM and DiffGM3 enable end-to-end differentiable optimization through MMV dynamics, making them suitable for integration into differentiable autonomy stacks. We evaluate these dynamics models in both open-loop and closed-loop settings: (1) open-loop trajectory matching, where DiffKBM and DiffGM3 are integrated as a dynamics layer within DiffStack and optimized to reproduce real-world MMV trajectories, and (2) closed-loop autonomous navigation, where DiffKBM and DiffGM3 are paired with a differentiable MPC controller in CrowdNav pedestrian scenarios. In the open-loop setting, DiffGM3 outperforms DiffKBM in reproducing trajectories with improvements in ADE and NLL across bicycle, scooter, and motorcycle modes, and reductions in planning loss for bicycle and motorcycle trajectories. We also find that, in closed-loop settings, DiffGM3 improves on DiffKBM's CrowdNav performance by producing 55\% fewer collisions and a 75\% lower discomfort frequency for the bicycle mode.

Abstract:Autonomous micro-mobility vehicles (MMVs) such as wheelchairs, scooters, and bicycles have the potential to improve mobility access and support safe low-speed transportation in pedestrian-shared spaces. Achieving MMV autonomy will require realistic, predictable MMV motion. However, many existing autonomous vehicle stacks rely on simplified kinematic models that fail to capture key MMV characteristics such as tire slip, friction, and wheel layouts, limiting realism and gradient-based optimization. In this paper, we explore differentiable formulations of dynamics models for autonomous micro-mobility systems. We first construct DiffKBM, a differentiable version of the kinematic bicycle model (KBM). Then, we introduce DiffGM3, a differentiable formulation of the General Micro-Mobility Model (GM3), a unified tire-based dynamics formulation for micro-mobility vehicles that supports a wide range of MMV configurations. DiffKBM and DiffGM3 enable end-to-end differentiable optimization through MMV dynamics, making them suitable for integration into differentiable autonomy stacks. We evaluate these dynamics models in both open-loop and closed-loop settings: (1) open-loop trajectory matching, where DiffKBM and DiffGM3 are integrated as a dynamics layer within DiffStack and optimized to reproduce real-world MMV trajectories, and (2) closed-loop autonomous navigation, where DiffKBM and DiffGM3 are paired with a differentiable MPC controller in CrowdNav pedestrian scenarios. In the open-loop setting, DiffGM3 outperforms DiffKBM in reproducing trajectories with improvements in ADE and NLL across bicycle, scooter, and motorcycle modes, and reductions in planning loss for bicycle and motorcycle trajectories. We also find that, in closed-loop settings, DiffGM3 improves on DiffKBM's CrowdNav performance by producing 55\% fewer collisions and a 75\% lower discomfort frequency for the bicycle mode.

Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2609.31885 [cs.RO]

(or arXiv:2609.31885v1 [cs.RO] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31885 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 347 words

Related coverage