Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces DICA, an inference-time mechanism that monitors visual attention entropy and output image correlation to correct hallucinations in multimodal large language models. By dynamically triggering contrastive alignment when these indicators signal drift or underutilization of visual evidence, the method significantly improves grounding reliability without altering model weights. The approach offers a practical pathway for enhancing trustworthiness in vision-language systems through lightweight intervention strategies.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

DICA: Dual-Indicator Guided Contrastive Alignment in Multimodal Large Language Models

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.23944v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Human visual reasoning typically follows a coarse-to-fine attention process, starting from global scene understanding and gradually focusing on question-relevant regions. However, multimodal large language models may deviate from this pattern due to attention drift and the underutilization of visual evidence, which can lead to hallucinations. To mitigate these issues, this study proposes a Dual-Indicator Guided Contrastive Alignment (DICA), which tracks two information-theoretic indicators during inference: Visual Attention Entropy (VAE), which reflects the concentration of visual attention, and Output Image Correlation (OIC), which measures the dependence of generated outputs on the visual input. An abnormal increase in VAE or a decrease in OIC corresponds to different failure modes, which trigger targeted contrastive alignment to restore visual grounding. Experimental results across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that DICA consistently outperforms existing approaches and substantially reduces hallucinations, highlighting the effectiveness of indicator-driven intervention in improving multimodal inference reliability. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/BGWH123/DICA/.

Abstract:Human visual reasoning typically follows a coarse-to-fine attention process, starting from global scene understanding and gradually focusing on question-relevant regions. However, multimodal large language models may deviate from this pattern due to attention drift and the underutilization of visual evidence, which can lead to hallucinations. To mitigate these issues, this study proposes a Dual-Indicator Guided Contrastive Alignment (DICA), which tracks two information-theoretic indicators during inference: Visual Attention Entropy (VAE), which reflects the concentration of visual attention, and Output Image Correlation (OIC), which measures the dependence of generated outputs on the visual input. An abnormal increase in VAE or a decrease in OIC corresponds to different failure modes, which trigger targeted contrastive alignment to restore visual grounding. Experimental results across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that DICA consistently outperforms existing approaches and substantially reduces hallucinations, highlighting the effectiveness of indicator-driven intervention in improving multimodal inference reliability. The code is publicly available at this https URL.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2607.23944 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.23944v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.23944 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.1933 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 256 words

Related coverage