aiqbench analysis
Dialogue SWE-Bench introduces a critical evaluation framework for coding agents that specifically measures their ability to interact dialogically rather than operating autonomously. The study reveals a distinct performance gap between raw coding capability and conversational competence, highlighting dialogue as an understudied dimension of agent development. This benchmark is essential for advancing the next generation of interactive software engineering assistants beyond current autonomous baselines.
Dialogue SWE-Bench: A Benchmark for Dialogue-Driven Coding Agents
arXiv:2606.13995v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: AI coding agents have rapidly transformed software engineering, powering widely used interactive coding assistants. Despite their interactive real-world use, existing benchmarks evaluate them as fully-autonomous systems. In this work, we introduce Dialogue SWE-Bench, an automatic benchmark dataset for evaluating the ability of coding agents to resolve real-world software engineering problems through dialogue with a user. We design a novel, persona-grounded user simulator to support our task evaluation, and augment our task evaluation with automatic evaluations of dialogue quality. We also propose a new schema-guided agent, aimed at improving the dialogue capabilities of off-the-shelf coding agents, which improves over strong baselines by 3-14%. Our results indicate that better coding models do not always correspond to better dialogue models, suggesting that dialogue capability is a distinct and currently understudied dimension of coding agent performance.
Abstract:AI coding agents have rapidly transformed software engineering, powering widely used interactive coding assistants. Despite their interactive real-world use, existing benchmarks evaluate them as fully-autonomous systems. In this work, we introduce Dialogue SWE-Bench, an automatic benchmark dataset for evaluating the ability of coding agents to resolve real-world software engineering problems through dialogue with a user. We design a novel, persona-grounded user simulator to support our task evaluation, and augment our task evaluation with automatic evaluations of dialogue quality. We also propose a new schema-guided agent, aimed at improving the dialogue capabilities of off-the-shelf coding agents, which improves over strong baselines by 3-14%. Our results indicate that better coding models do not always correspond to better dialogue models, suggesting that dialogue capability is a distinct and currently understudied dimension of coding agent performance.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2606.13995 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2606.13995v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.13995 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 227 words
Related coverage
CAMeR: Keyword-Gated Hybrid Activation for Adaptive Memory Retention in LLM Agents
arXiv · Jul 25, 2026
[AINews] Meta Connect 2026: Muse glasses, voice, video, and Charm
Latent Space · Sep 24, 2026

[AINews] Meta Muse Wonder & Wonder Full: MSL’s Claude 5.5-tier Frontier Model
Latent Space · Oct 13, 2026

Benchtalks #2: The future of coding benchmarks
Snorkel AI Blog · Jun 3, 2026