Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research addresses a critical flaw in Omni-LLMs where strong overall performance masks a disconnect between multimodal perception and decision-making logic. By introducing Causal Modality Sensitivity metrics and the training-free MSA framework, the authors provide a method to restore faithfulness using Singular Value Decomposition on hidden states. This work is essential for developers building reliable autonomous agents who need models that truly integrate sensory inputs rather than relying solely on language priors.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Diagnosing and Mitigating Perception-Decision Misalignment in Omni-LLMs via Modality Subspace Activation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.14655v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Omni-Large Language Models (Omni-LLMs) power complex multi-modal reasoning in applications like World Action Models and autonomous agents. However, their strong performance often masks a profound Perceptual-Decision Misalignment (PDM), where decisions remain unfaithful to multi-modal perceptions. To diagnose this, we formalize Causal Modality Sensitivity (CMS), operationalized via a dual-lens framework: Answer Retention Rate (ARR) at the macro behavioral level, and Logit Angular Discrepancy (LAD) to track microscopic distribution shifts. We also curate CausalMSBench, a diagnostic dataset isolating language priors. Benchmarking reveals that popular Omni-LLMs exhibit critically low CMS, showing negligible distribution shifts even when key modalities are removed. To rectify this, we propose Modality Subspace Activation (MSA), a training-free inference-time framework that uses Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to estimate modal activation strengths. MSA dynamically balances modal projections in the last hidden state, effectively restoring CMS across benchmarks.

Abstract:Omni-Large Language Models (Omni-LLMs) power complex multi-modal reasoning in applications like World Action Models and autonomous agents. However, their strong performance often masks a profound Perceptual-Decision Misalignment (PDM), where decisions remain unfaithful to multi-modal perceptions. To diagnose this, we formalize Causal Modality Sensitivity (CMS), operationalized via a dual-lens framework: Answer Retention Rate (ARR) at the macro behavioral level, and Logit Angular Discrepancy (LAD) to track microscopic distribution shifts. We also curate CausalMSBench, a diagnostic dataset isolating language priors. Benchmarking reveals that popular Omni-LLMs exhibit critically low CMS, showing negligible distribution shifts even when key modalities are removed. To rectify this, we propose Modality Subspace Activation (MSA), a training-free inference-time framework that uses Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to estimate modal activation strengths. MSA dynamically balances modal projections in the last hidden state, effectively restoring CMS across benchmarks.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV)

arXiv:2608.14655 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.14655v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14655 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 236 words

Related coverage