Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Products

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces a two-stage framework that converts diagnostic machine translation evaluations into targeted repairs, effectively bridging the gap between assessment and quality improvement in production environments. By separating the evaluation and editing processes, the method reduces paraphrastic drift while maintaining strong alignment with human preferences across multiple languages and models. The approach represents a significant step forward in optimizing LLM-based post-editing workflows for domain-specific translation tasks.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Diagnose, Then Repair: A Two-Stage MQM-Guided Post-Editing Framework for Domain-Specific Machine Translation

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.22793v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM-based machine translation evaluation can closely match human judgments, but in practice it remains largely diagnostic, with the signals rarely translating into direct quality improvements under real production constraints. We propose a two-stage, evaluator-guided automatic post-editing framework that turns MQM-style evaluation into targeted repairs: a retrieval-augmented LLM evaluator outputs structured, span-level MQM diagnoses under an explicit edit contract, and a separate LLM post-editor applies minimal edits restricted to those diagnoses. This separation improves controllability and reduces paraphrastic drift compared to one-stage "judge-and-refine" baselines. In a systematic study involving seven LLMs spanning three model providers and seven languages, our best configuration consistently improves both COMET-22 and COMETKiwi scores over one-stage post-edit methods, while the evaluator's error spans and severities show strong agreement with human MQM annotations and human editor preferences.

Abstract:LLM-based machine translation evaluation can closely match human judgments, but in practice it remains largely diagnostic, with the signals rarely translating into direct quality improvements under real production constraints. We propose a two-stage, evaluator-guided automatic post-editing framework that turns MQM-style evaluation into targeted repairs: a retrieval-augmented LLM evaluator outputs structured, span-level MQM diagnoses under an explicit edit contract, and a separate LLM post-editor applies minimal edits restricted to those diagnoses. This separation improves controllability and reduces paraphrastic drift compared to one-stage "judge-and-refine" baselines. In a systematic study involving seven LLMs spanning three model providers and seven languages, our best configuration consistently improves both COMET-22 and COMETKiwi scores over one-stage post-edit methods, while the evaluator's error spans and severities show strong agreement with human MQM annotations and human editor preferences.

Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.22793 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.22793v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22793 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 6: Industry Track), pp. 1683-1698, 2026

https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2026.acl-industry.115 Focus to learn more DOI(s) linking to related resources

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 256 words

Related coverage