Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

DI-Bench introduces a novel pipeline for automatically generating enterprise-level benchmarks that specifically test the integration of business knowledge with analytical computation, addressing a critical gap in current evaluation standards. By constructing artifact linkage graphs over structured data, this tool enables rigorous assessment of how well AI models handle rule-grounded reasoning and complex query execution tasks. The study reveals significant performance limitations, showing that existing models struggle substantially when computational tasks require modifying logic based on retrieved business rules.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

DI-Bench: Systematically Generating In-Domain Data Intelligence Benchmarks for Enterprise Agents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.05776v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating enterprise agents on domain-specific benchmarks is critical, yet public benchmarks rarely evaluate whether agents can integrate business knowledge with analytical computation, and constructing such benchmarks manually is costly. We present DI-Bench, a pipeline for generating realistic benchmarks for data intelligence (DI), the practice of extracting insights from large volumes of enterprise data. To emulate realistic DI tasks that require both computation and knowledge retrieval, DI-Bench builds an artifact linkage graph over data tables, dimensions, metrics, and documents to form questions involving structured data and associated knowledge. Ground truth answers are derived via query execution, followed by LLM question generation and validation. Applied to two public datasets, the pipeline produces a 731-task benchmark covering knowledge retrieval, analytical computation, and rule-grounded reasoning. To show the discriminatory capability and difficulty of the benchmark, we evaluate four models, revealing a substantial finding: models achieve only 32% accuracy when doing computational tasks where retrieved business rules modify the computation.

Abstract:Evaluating enterprise agents on domain-specific benchmarks is critical, yet public benchmarks rarely evaluate whether agents can integrate business knowledge with analytical computation, and constructing such benchmarks manually is costly. We present DI-Bench, a pipeline for generating realistic benchmarks for data intelligence (DI), the practice of extracting insights from large volumes of enterprise data. To emulate realistic DI tasks that require both computation and knowledge retrieval, DI-Bench builds an artifact linkage graph over data tables, dimensions, metrics, and documents to form questions involving structured data and associated knowledge. Ground truth answers are derived via query execution, followed by LLM question generation and validation. Applied to two public datasets, the pipeline produces a 731-task benchmark covering knowledge retrieval, analytical computation, and rule-grounded reasoning. To show the discriminatory capability and difficulty of the benchmark, we evaluate four models, revealing a substantial finding: models achieve only 32% accuracy when doing computational tasks where retrieved business rules modify the computation.

19 pages, 3 figures, 13 tables. Accepted to the EMNLP 2026 Industry Track

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.05776 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2609.05776v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05776 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 262 words

Related coverage