Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper presents practical methods for characterising noise on a superconducting quantum processor with a square-lattice layout, including a revised cycle-benchmarking protocol and an extended tensor-network tomography approach. The main value for quantum readers is the validation step: the authors check whether learned noise models predict real noisy results on benchmark circuits, and use that to estimate how large error-mitigated circuits can get on current hardware. These are incremental hardware-characterisation results rather than a demonstrated computational advantage.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Development and experimental implementation of noise characterisation techniques on a superconducting quantum processor

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.18000v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Noise characterisation not only enables error mitigation but also provides valuable information about the intrinsic performance of a quantum device, identifying dominant error contributions and bounding noise stability well beyond the aggregated calibration data. Deploying such methods on a specific hardware topology must combine efficiency and accuracy, assess noise stability, and validate the reconstructed noise model. Here we develop and implement these methods on a superconducting processor with square-lattice topology. First, we revise the cycle-benchmarking protocol and reduce the bias arising from unlearnable degrees of freedom via a regularised cost function. Second, we extend a previously developed tensor-network tomography method to match the device layout and show how its accuracy can be improved by repeated layer execution. Both methods allow approximate sublayer noise models to be extracted from parent ones. Using noise characterisation as a tool, we map the noise structure, track drift, and validate the adequacy of the learnt noise models against experimentally observed noisy estimations in benchmark physical and chemistry circuits. These results inform further improvements in the underlying technology and provide estimates of the size of noise-mitigated circuits that the device can support.

Abstract:Noise characterisation not only enables error mitigation but also provides valuable information about the intrinsic performance of a quantum device, identifying dominant error contributions and bounding noise stability well beyond the aggregated calibration data. Deploying such methods on a specific hardware topology must combine efficiency and accuracy, assess noise stability, and validate the reconstructed noise model. Here we develop and implement these methods on a superconducting processor with square-lattice topology. First, we revise the cycle-benchmarking protocol and reduce the bias arising from unlearnable degrees of freedom via a regularised cost function. Second, we extend a previously developed tensor-network tomography method to match the device layout and show how its accuracy can be improved by repeated layer execution. Both methods allow approximate sublayer noise models to be extracted from parent ones. Using noise characterisation as a tool, we map the noise structure, track drift, and validate the adequacy of the learnt noise models against experimentally observed noisy estimations in benchmark physical and chemistry circuits. These results inform further improvements in the underlying technology and provide estimates of the size of noise-mitigated circuits that the device can support.

arXiv:2610.18000 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.18000v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.18000 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 277 words

Related coverage